Sunday, August 28, 2005

New Orleans is f**ked. Hurricane Katrina blog.
Germany still not safe for dead Jews.

Jewish cemetery in Germany defaced with swastikas

A Jewish cemetery in the central German town of Ebersburg was desecrated by vandals, who sprayed swastikas and other Nazi symbols on gravestones, police said Sunday.

Fourteen gravestones were defaced with the paint, and two more were knocked over, said police in Ebersburg, near Fulda.

The damage was caused sometime between Wednesday and Saturday, and no suspects have been taken into custody.


Apparently the Nazis of the 1940s took care of the problem that there would be anyone around to notice the vandalism right away.
Two heroes save an unknown number of innocent civilians from death at the hands of a Palestinian terrorist.

Guards save dozens in Beersheba blast

A suicide bomb attack at the entrance to the central bus station in Beersheba critically wounded two security guards Sunday morning and caused a total of 48 people to be evacuated to the Soroka Medical Center.

The two security guards in their 20's who prevented the suicide bomber from getting onto a bus were in serious condition at Soroka University Medical Center on Sunday.

Both their lives are still in danger after suffering burns and shrapnel wounds. One of the guards underwent surgery for his wounds, while the other had shrapnel in his eyes.


I pray for their speedy recovery.

Thank G-d also for the sharp Israeli bus driver who sent the terrorist away.

The bomber had aroused the suspicions of the driver of a crowded Number 9 bus. Asked by the bomber if his bus went to Soroka, the driver directed him to another area, then alerted security guards, who pursued the attacker until he set off the bomb. The explosion critically injured one of the guards. The other was listed in serious but stable condition.

Initial investigations suggested that the bomber had intended to blow up at the Soroka Medical Center, Channel 2 reported.

Read what a Palestinian doctor had to say about Soroka after the last attempt to attack the hospital.

Gaza doctor fumes over bomb plot at Soroka

I've decided that every time I hear about a terroist attack in Israel I will donate some amount to either One Family Fund or another organziation dedicated to healing the physically and psychologically wounded. A site to donate to American Friends of Soroka Hospital is here.

UPDATE: Baruch Hashem - Beersheba bombing 'heroes' recovering

Although they both suffered serious burns, shrapnel wounds and other damage and were in unstable condition during the 24 hours after being admitted to Soroka, both have undergone surgery and are stable and out of danger.

Saturday, August 27, 2005

On PBS' P.O.V. program this week (Tuesday in the Dallas area) - Hiding and Seeking - Faith and Tolerance After the Holocaust

Is it possible to heal wounds and bitterness passed down through generations? An Orthodox Jewish father tries to alert his adult sons to the dangers of creating impenetrable barriers between themselves and those outside their faith. He takes them on an emotional journey to Poland to track down the family who risked their lives to hide their grandfather for more than two years during World War II. Like many children of survivors, the sons feel that Poland is a country that is incurably anti-Semitic, but it is precisely here that they meet people who personify the highest levels of compassion. "Hiding and Seeking" explores the Holocaust's effect on faith in God as well as faith in our fellow human beings. A co-presentation with the Independent Television Service (ITVS).

The show tends to have a liberal slant (see no one hates Jews in Poland! How could anyone claim that Poles were anything but innocent during the Holcoaust?), but it should still be interesting anyway.
Having spent a number of years living in NY City, I had heard that there were certain places in Central Park that gay men would go to "hook up". Little did I know that Modern Orthodox young adults also have a place of their own.

With Their Eyes Only

On a midsummer Saturday afternoon, the Great Lawn in Central Park is the best place - perhaps the only place - for these modestly dressed eligible bachelors and bachelorettes to meet, so much so that by 5 p.m., the lawn has been transformed into a unmistakable singles scene for the Sabbath-observant Jews of the Upper West Side.

I don't know if this still holds true, but the Lincoln Square synangogue on the Uppper West Side used to be known as "Wink 'n' Stare".
Another Hitchens related link - this one to a video of a Hitchens appearance on Jon Stewart where the left is claiming an intellectual smackdown victory.

Christopher Hitchens vs Jon Stewart

I of course, beg to differ, as I posted on my brother-in-laws journal.

Thanks for the Hitchens-Stewart link. It's nice to see two people who are part of the left-center and right-center have a semi-serious conversation on Iraq and terorrism. As Hitchens himself says in an article he mentioned in the segment see my previous post), the problem is that Bush has taken to platitiudes when it actually takes more than a few minutes to explain why we're better off today than we were before we went into Iraq and people need to listen.

I went back to look at the tape a second time to see if this really was an intellectual smackdown. I would argue that it wasn't. Some of your readers may confuse applause from the home crowd after a monologue with a debating victory.

Stewart first asked "Why Iraq?" when other countires are also "evil", a valid question to which Hitchens had an detailed answer (there's more in his article). Hitchens even explained in detail why we had the international legal (if not moral) authority to go into Iraq. Stewart did not claim he was incorrect - he just implied that political action (treaties, laws, etc) which threatens the prevention or punishment of crimes against humanity is meant to be symbolic and to actually fight against regimes committing these crimes would be "crazy". Is this really a morally justifiable position?

Stewart then accuses us of wanting to go in and "re-draw the map" in the Middle East in a Churchillian manner. Huh? If anything many detractors of the handling of the war claim that we will fail because we are NOT re-drawing the map and forcing the Iraqis to stick to the old English-imposed borders.

Stewart then says Bush is incompetent which is always the refuge a liberal takes when there is no counter-argument on the policy. Hitchens agrees (seriously) so there is no point of contention there.

The next point Hitchens tries to show is that Iraq harbored terrorists that actually attacked the US and it's citizens and more specifically al-Zarqawi, a man he claims is today possibly more dangerous than bin Laden. Stewart replies with a not very specific or enlightening retort of "so does everyone else", specifically mentioning Qatar as a palce that harbors terrorists. In fact, Qatar has been relatively liberal in both it's stand on women's issues and freedom of the press (Al-Jazeera is based there) among other things. They were shocked when they experienced their first terror attack earlier this year.

Then of course Stewart picks out the least important of Hitchen's examples (the architect of the Achille Lauro hijacking) and says that there's a differnece between "old-school" terrorism and al-Qaeda terrorism. Hitchens wan't arguing that. He was saying that Iraq welcomed all levels of terrorists - none were denied entry or support - which was the point.

Finally, Stewart goes into a little Bush-bashing monologue which I don't necessarily disagree with, but his conduct as President really has no bearing on whether what we're doing in Iraq is right and whether anyone, including the Iraqis, are better off now than they were with Hussein in power. Since Hitchens didn't have a chance to respond, and although the audience gave a nice round of applause, I can't consider this a debating point won - besides Hitchens probably would have agreed.

To me Stewart's best line is when he repsonds to Hitchens at the end by saying that "I need the President to be on my side." Of course, just becuase he disagrees with the President's PR methods doesn't mean that the President is not on his side. My five five year old always thinks I mishandle her bedtime (too early) and dinner menu (not enough chocolate), but I assure you I am on her side.
Christopher Hitchens uses the unimpeachable power of logic, anethema to liberals who think that because we are not perfect, we can't do any good in the world.

A War to Be Proud Of

LET ME BEGIN WITH A simple sentence that, even as I write it, appears less than Swiftian in the modesty of its proposal: "Prison conditions at Abu Ghraib have improved markedly and dramatically since the arrival of Coalition troops in Baghdad."

I could undertake to defend that statement against any member of Human Rights Watch or Amnesty International, and I know in advance that none of them could challenge it, let alone negate it. Before March 2003, Abu Ghraib was an abattoir, a torture chamber, and a concentration camp. Now, and not without reason, it is an international byword for Yankee imperialism and sadism. Yet the improvement is still, unarguably, the difference between night and day. How is it possible that the advocates of a post-Saddam Iraq have been placed on the defensive in this manner? And where should one begin?....


...puerility in adults is quite another thing, and considerably less charming. "You said there were WMDs in Iraq and that Saddam had friends in al Qaeda. . . . Blah, blah, pants on fire." I have had many opportunities to tire of this mantra. It takes ten seconds to intone the said mantra. It would take me, on my most eloquent C-SPAN day, at the very least five minutes to say that Abdul Rahman Yasin, who mixed the chemicals for the World Trade Center attack in 1993, subsequently sought and found refuge in Baghdad; that Dr. Mahdi Obeidi, Saddam's senior physicist, was able to lead American soldiers to nuclear centrifuge parts and a blueprint for a complete centrifuge (the crown jewel of nuclear physics) buried on the orders of Qusay Hussein; that Saddam's agents were in Damascus as late as February 2003, negotiating to purchase missiles off the shelf from North Korea; or that Rolf Ekeus, the great Swedish socialist who founded the inspection process in Iraq after 1991, has told me for the record that he was offered a $2 million bribe in a face-to-face meeting with Tariq Aziz. And these eye-catching examples would by no means exhaust my repertoire, or empty my quiver. Yes, it must be admitted that Bush and Blair made a hash of a good case, largely because they preferred to scare people rather than enlighten them or reason with them. Still, the only real strategy of deception has come from those who believe, or pretend, that Saddam Hussein was no problem.


Read it all.
It seems to me that this is the kind of museum we need at Ground Zero.

Anne Frank’s house inspires 9/11 museum

At the second-floor museum in Manhattan’s Meatpacking District, visitors are met by three-dimensional displays of photographs that pull the viewer close to the terror, dirt, sweat — and death.

Suson took one of the first photos of the firefighter honor guard that carried remains as they were found. He shot the scene in close-up, as he did other moments, such as a firefighter helping carry out the remains of his own son.


Last year, Suson went to Amsterdam, Netherlands, and visited the home of Anne Frank, the Jewish teenager who wrote a diary of her life before the Nazis sent her to the Bergen Belsen death camp.

“Within two hours of being in there, I felt like I’d come to know this little girl. It put a face on the Holocaust,” said the 33-year-old Suson. “I went back to the hotel and cried.”


I want people to cry when they go to Ground Zero and then think about the monsters that caused such mindless death and destruction.

We do not need George Soros' International Freedom Center.

Take Back the Memorial! I've signed the petition.

Wednesday, August 24, 2005

Odd quote of the day from Eleanor Clift's report, Challenging Hillary

“This is a great time to have a conversation between two very sharp women, as long as we don’t get too mired down in the catfight,” says Marie Wilson, founder of the White House Project, which is dedicated to advancing the idea of a woman president.

I can't believe a woman advocating the benefits of putting a woman in the White House would really use the word "catfight" here.
From Power Line - so good I have to post the whole thing.

Some Thoughts on Casualties in Times of War and Peace

It is universally acknowledged that public support for the Iraq war is eroding. Some of the polls supporting this claim are faulty because they are based on obviously misleading internal data, but the basic point cannot be denied: many Americans, possibly even a majority, have turned against the war.

This should hardly be a surprise. On the contrary, how could it be otherwise? News reporting on the war consists almost entirely of itemizing casualties. Headlines say: "Two Marines killed by roadside bomb." Rarely do the accompanying stories--let alone the headlines that are all that most people read--explain where the Marines were going, or why; what strategic objective they and their comrades were pursuing, and how successful they were in achieving it; or how many terrorists were also killed. For Americans who do not seek out alternative news sources like this one, the war in Iraq is little but a succession of American casualties. The wonder is that so many Americans do, nevertheless, support it.

The sins of the news media in reporting on Iraq are mainly sins of omission. Not only do news outlets generally fail to report the progress that is being made, and often fail to put military operations into any kind of tactical or strategic perspective, they assiduously avoid talking about the overarching strategic reason for our involvement there: the Bush administration's conviction that the only way to solve the problem of Islamic terrorism, long term, is to help liberate the Arab countries so that their peoples' energies will be channelled into the peaceful pursuits of free enterprise and democracy, rather than into bizarre ideologies and terrorism. Partly this omission is due to laziness or incomprehension, but I think it is mostly attributable to the fact that if the media acknowledged that reforming the Arab world, in order to drain the terrorist swamp, has always been the principal purpose of the Iraq war, it would take the sting out of their "No large stockpiles of WMDs!" theme.

One wonders how past wars could have been fought if news reporting had consisted almost entirely of a recitation of casualties. The D-Day invasion was one of the greatest organizational feats ever achieved by human beings, and one of the most successful. But what if the only news Americans had gotten about the invasion was that 2,500 allied soldiers died that day, with no discussion of whether the invasion was a success or a failure, and no acknowledgement of the huge strategic stakes that were involved? Or what if such news coverage had continued, day by day, through the entire Battle of Normandy, with Americans having no idea whether the battle was being won or lost, but knowing only that 54,000 Allied troops had been killed by the Germans?

How about the Battle of Midway, one of the most one-sided and strategically significant battles of world history? What if there had been no "triumphalism"--that dreaded word--in the American media's reporting on the battle, and Americans had learned only that 307 Americans died--never mind that the Japanese lost more than ten times that many--without being told the decisive significance of the engagement?

Or take Iwo Jima, the iconic Marine Corps battle. If Americans knew only that nearly 7,000 Marines lost their lives there, with no context, no strategy, and only sporadic acknowledgement of the heroism that accompanied those thousands of deaths, would the American people have continued the virtually unanimous support for our country, our soldiers and our government that characterized World War II?

We are conducting an experiment never before seen, as far as I know, in the history of the human race. We are trying to fight a war under the auspices of an establishment that is determined--to put the most charitable face on it--to emphasize American casualties over all other information about the war.

Sometimes it becomes necessary to state the obvious: being a soldier is a dangerous thing. This is why we honor our service members' courage. For a soldier, sailor or Marine, "courage" isn't an easily-abused abstraction--"it took a lot of courage to vote against the farm bill"--it's a requirement of the job.

Even in peacetime. The media's breathless tabulation of casualties in Iraq--now, over 1,800 deaths--is generally devoid of context. Here's some context: between 1983 and 1996, 18,006 American military personnel died accidentally in the service of their country. That death rate of 1,286 per year exceeds the rate of combat deaths in Iraq by a ratio of nearly two to one.

That's right: all through the years when hardly anyone was paying attention, soldiers, sailors and Marines were dying in accidents, training and otherwise, at nearly twice the rate of combat deaths in Iraq from the start of the war in 2003 to the present. Somehow, though, when there was no political hay to be made, I don't recall any great outcry, or gleeful reporting, or erecting of crosses in the President's home town. In fact, I'll offer a free six-pack to the first person who can find evidence that any liberal expressed concern--any concern--about the 18,006 American service members who died accidentally in service of their country from 1983 to 1996.

The point? Being a soldier is not safe, and never will be. Driving in my car this afternoon, I heard a mainstream media reporter say that around 2,000 service men and women have died in Afghanistan and Iraq "on President Bush's watch." As though the job of the Commander in Chief were to make the jobs of our soldiers safe. They're not safe, and they never will be safe, in peacetime, let alone wartime.

What is the President's responsibility? To expend our most precious resources only when necessary, in service of the national interest. We would all prefer that our soldiers never be required to fight. Everyone--most of all, every politician--much prefers peace to war. But when our enemies fly airplanes into our skyscrapers; attack the nerve center of our armed forces; bomb our embassies; scheme to blow up our commercial airliners; try to assassinate our former President; do their best to shoot down our military aircraft; murder our citizens; assassinate our diplomats overseas; and attack our naval vessels--well, then, the time has come to fight. And when the time comes to fight, our military personnel are ready. They don't ask to be preserved from all danger. They know their job is dangerous; they knew that when they signed up. They are prepared to face the risk, on our behalf. All they ask is to be allowed to win.

It is, I think, a reasonable request. It's the least that we--all Americans, including reporters and editors--can do.

Tuesday, August 23, 2005

Ripped from the pages of today's Little Green Footballs (which ripped this from the pages of Brutally Honest)..a Bob Hope classic.

Some Things Don't Change.

The truth finally comes out regarding one of the most famous blown calls in sports history.

Maradona Gives First-Hand Account of Famous Goal

Diego Maradona acknowledged that he struck the ball with his hand in the famous "Hand of God" goal against England in the 1986 World Cup quarterfinals.

Speaking on his local television talk show Monday night, Maradona called one of soccer's most controversial goals "something that just came out of me. It was a bit of mischief."

Maradona appeared to punch the ball into the net, and officials allowed the goal to stand despite protests by the English team. Argentina went on to win the match, 2-1.

It then won the World Cup.


Monday, August 22, 2005

You have got to be kidding me.

Nonetheless, the pullout has displayed deep fissures, among parties and generations and within Zionism itself. And it has made some Israelis wonder why at least some of the same consideration and sensitivity cannot be shown by the army, at the many checkpoints that form a notional border, toward Palestinians.

Who are these Israelis? How the hell does the New York Times even allow someone to compare a process to weed out terrorists who are on their way to kill dozens of innocent Jews versus the ethnic cleansing (isn't that what they call it) of Jews by their own brothers and sisters? And you know when the Times uses the term "some Israelis", it's jounrnalist-speak for "a growing/significant number". Bullcrap.



Maybe all this kid needed was a Jewish shoulder to cry on. In any case if the Israeli army really put no value on Palestinian life, this kid would have been hamburger.

I wonder how many Palestinian/Arab deaths have been prevented by Israelis who've caught suicide bombers before they could take action.

Sunday, August 21, 2005

Just in case anyone is under the impression that the Palestinians are holding their fire during the disengagement (which by the way is happening faster than originally planned). You're wrong.

An IDF tank commander was lightly wounded Sunday by Palestinian gunfire in a settlement area of the Gaza Strip.

The officer was hit in the hand by a sniper, OC Southern Command Maj. Gen. Dan Harel said.

The shooting occurred between the evacuated settlements of Neveh Dekalim and Ganei Tal, said an army spokesman.

Palestinian groups Hamas and Islamic Jihad have mostly held their fire during the Israeli withdrawal.

Harel said that since the withdrawal began early Monday there had been 19 shooting incidents and 12 mortar attacks. That's far fewer than normal during the last five years of violence in Gaza. (Ed. note - how sad is that?)

The general said coordination has been "very good" with the Palestinian Authority, which governs Gaza and the West Bank.


Of course if you read yesterday's AP reports, you might be confused.

No Attacks in Gaza Pullout's First Week

Friday, August 19, 2005

When the liberal, secular elite in Tel Aviv have to start worrying about missiles instead of suicide bombers, there's gonna be a big can of whoop-ass opened up on the Palestinians and no group in Israeli society will have the power or desire to prevent it. The Arabs' biggest mistake would be to unite what is now a fractured society in Israel which is not sure what to do next.

Mashaal:'Beginning of end for Israel'

Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal declared on Wednesday that the Israeli withdrawal from the Gaza Strip and northern West Bank marked the beginning of the end of the Zionist dream in Palestine....

Asked about Hamas's future plans, Zahar said: "Neither the liberation of the Gaza Strip, nor the liberation of the West Bank or even Jerusalem will suffice us. Hamas will pursue the armed struggle until the liberation of all our lands. We don't recognize the state of Israel or its right to hold onto one inch of Palestine. Palestine is an Islamic land belonging to all the Muslims."...

"We will transfer two-thirds of our budget to the West Bank," he said. "Our rockets have a range of 18 kilometers. This means that if we fire them from Kalkilya, they will hit the occupied city of Tal al-Rabi [Tel Aviv]."


Who knows - maybe Sharon is using the Bush plan of attracting all the head terrorists to one spot where they'll be easier to arrest and kill.
Two thumbs up for the Pope.

Pope Visits a Synagogue in Germany

The pope underlined his commitment to continue in the path of his predecessor, John Paul II, who made the first papal visit to a synagogue in Rome in 1986 and improved relations between Catholics and Jews.

''Today I, too, wish to reaffirm that I intend to continue on the path toward improved relations and friendship with the Jewish people, following the decisive lead given by John Paul II,'' said Benedict, who did much of the theological groundwork for John Paul's outreach while serving as a Vatican official in charge of doctrine....

He said it was important not to paper over differences: ''I would encourage sincere and trustful dialogue between Jews and Christians, for only in this way will it be possible to arrive at a shared interpretation of disputed historical questions, and above all to make progress towards a theological evaluation of the relationship between Judaism and Christianity,'' he said.

''This dialogue, if it is to be sincere, must not gloss over or underestimate the existing differences. ... We need to show respect for one another, and to love one another.''


Thursday, August 18, 2005

If you want to understand the difference between the liberal left and the conservative right regarding Israel, all you have to do is read the following two editorials.

From the New York Times - Gaza Reality Check

Money quote - "It (Gaza) was never part of the Zionist state intended by the United Nations partition plan that led to the establishment of Israel in 1948."

In other words, the Times thinks Israel only has the right to the blue portion of this map:



From the Wall Street Journal - Israel's Agony, Palestine's Future

Money quote - "Contrary to received opinion, for most of Israel's occupation these settlers were an economic boon to Palestinians, providing them with agricultural and small-factory jobs that had never existed under the previous Egyptian military administration."

I stand with those who defend my people's right to live wherever they choose and see the good in them rather than the bad.

Let's not even go into Cindy "Israel Out of Palestine" Sheehan.

Monday, August 15, 2005

We should all be ready more Andy Borowitz

BUSH REFUSES TO SET TIMETABLE FOR WITHDRAWAL FROM CRAWFORD
Early End to Vacation Would ‘Send Terrible Signal,’ President Says

President George W. Bush said today that he understands and respects the views of those who are calling for him to cut short his summer vacation, but warned that an immediate withdrawal from Crawford, Texas would “send a terrible signal to the enemy.”

“The enemy would like nothing better than to see me cut short my vacation and get back to the White House,” Mr. Bush told reporters. “They hate my freedom.”

Sunday, August 14, 2005

If you're a Star Wars loving Jew, as I am, you will love this short film clip - "A Night in Shenkin Street"

For those who don't know, Shenkin Street is the heart of the Greenwich Village-y area in Tel Aviv.

Saturday, August 13, 2005

When President Bush talks about being relentless in hunting down the evildoers and he is criticized for not having wiped them all out yet after a few years of fighting and searching (especially OBL), perhaps he takes heart in a similar effort that has been going on for 60 years and will continue until the last person dies.

Justice, justice, shall you pursue. - Deuteronomy 16:20

Ex-Nazi officer's holiday in Italy cut short


The lakeside holiday of a former Nazi SS officer serving a life sentence for his part in a 1944 massacre was cut short on Friday following protests by outraged Italians and international Jewish groups.

Former SS Captain Erich Priebke, 92, decided to leave his friend’s villa in Cardana di Besozzo where he had been enjoying a police-supervised vacation approved by a court and head back to Rome, where he has been under house arrest for six years.
Blow, baby, blow. The National Jewish Outrach Program is sponsoring a shofar blowing contest with the winners getting a trip to Israel.

NJOP INVITES YOU TO BLOW US AWAY!


Video-taped entries will be judged based on clarity of sound, accuracy based on Jewish law, length of blast, and overall performance. The contest is open to both professional and amateur shofar-blowers. Five finalists will be selected to participate in the Great Shofar Blast-Off in New York City in September of 2005. The grand prize winner will receive a trip for two to Israel, and potential national media coverage.

Friday, August 12, 2005

A rich vein of city records from Sept. 11, including more than 12,000 pages of oral histories rendered in the voices of 503 firefighters, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians, were made public on Aug. 12. The New York Times has published all of them.

The Sept. 11 Records
According to the Bay Area Center for Voting Research, I live in the fifth most conservative city in the United States. I'm sure if you then separated the city into East and West, the West Side would be number one all by itself.

Just wondering...do they mean to say there's still a few pinko commie bastards left? Must be the guys who work the counters at Starbucks.
An Iraqi perspectve.

A message to Cindy Sheehan

Ma'am, we asked for your nation's help and we asked you to stand with us in our war and your nation's act was (and still is) an act of ultimate courage and unmatched sense of humanity.
Our request is justified, death was our daily bread and a million Iraqi mothers were expecting death to knock on their doors at any second to claim someone from their families.
Your face doesn't look strange to me at all; I see it everyday on endless numbers of Iraqi women who were struck by losses like yours.

Our fellow country men and women were buried alive, cut to pieces and thrown in acid pools and some were fed to the wild dogs while those who were lucky enough ran away to live like strangers and the Iraqi mother was left to grieve one son buried in an unfound grave and another one living far away who she might not get to see again....

You are free to go and leave us alone but what am I going to tell your million sisters in Iraq?

Wednesday, August 10, 2005

Beethoven's Torment at Pearls Before Swine.
Priests in an Italian town that heroically helped to save Jewsih children during WWII hope that the Pope recognizes their town as an example of followers of true Christian principles.

History: The Quality of Courage

In the end, there were 74 children—Jewish kids, from the ages of 6 to 18, who in 1942 and 1943 fled from Germany, Austria and Yugoslavia as their parents disappeared into the Nazis' concentration camps. With borders closing all over Europe, a Zionist organization smuggled them into northern Italy, to the village of Nonantola, built around a Benedictine monastery. Though Fascist Italy was not a haven, it was as safe as could be found. Their refuge was a large empty house, the Villa Emma, rented for them on the edge of town.

A picture from Villa Emma at the time...



And a poster from a remembrance ceremony earlier this year...



More here, here and here.

Tuesday, August 09, 2005

Was there really any doubt? Simpson: They're real, and they're fabulous

Jessica Simpson says her boobs were made for accessorizing.

The “Dukes of Hazzard” star, out promoting the flick, discussed her much-discussed breasts, and also blasted widespread buzz that they are fake.

“Mine are definitely real,” she revealed, according to SkyNews. “At school my boobs were bigger than all my friends’ and I was afraid to show them. Now, I feel they make my outfits look better. They’re like an accessory.”

Monday, August 08, 2005

Is there anything as sad as the fall from grace and superstardom of Doc Gooden, former wunderkind of the New York Mets?

Yes, there is.

Gooden's son held on drug charges


TAMPA - The oldest son of former baseball star Dwight Gooden was arrested Sunday on an outstanding warrant for violating probation.

Dwight Eugene Gooden Jr., 19, was arrested about 2:30 a.m. Tampa police said they found marijuana and gun ammunition in his car.

Police charged Gooden with possession of marijuana, a felon in possession of ammunition and two counts of violation of probation for previous possession of cocaine charges.
Here's a twist on Orwell's, "All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."

Multiculturalism is based on the lie that all cultures are morally equal. In practice, that soon degenerates to: All cultures are morally equal, except ours, which is worse.


From Cultures Aren't Equal by Michael Barone
Although conservative in many respects and deeply, but not fanatically, religious I agree wholeheartedly with the following from Cathy Young.

If some public school teachers are using evolution as a vehicle for atheist propaganda, that's outrageous, and a proper matter for school boards to deal with. If schools want to offer classes on religion and philosophy that explain religious views of the origins of life, fine. But to make science classrooms a platform for a pseudoscience whose sole intent is to counter ''godless" natural selection is a travesty of both science and faith. And this effort may well alienate many scientifically literate people from the Republican Party and conservatism, making the caricature of evolution as left-wing dogma a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Interesting article on security in shopping malls.

At America's Malls, Grim Preparations For the Unthinkable

I didn't realize this....

To date, there never has been a successful breach of an Israeli shopping mall by a suicide bomber despite more than a hundred attempts.

Sunday, August 07, 2005

Sad.

Peter Jennings Dies at 67.

ABC News Anchor Peter Jennings died today at his home in New York City. He was 67. On April 5, Jennings announced he had been diagnosed with lung cancer.

He is survived by his wife, Kayce Freed, his two children, Elizabeth, 25, and Christopher, 23, and his sister, Sarah Jennings.


Peter Jennings voice was one of the most comforting in all of news broadcasting and always came across as non-pretentious and caring. We've lost another great one and there aren't many left.

Friday, August 05, 2005

I'm not a great fan of Saudi Arabia, but I have to defend the Saudis when they are used as a lever politically against George Bush as they are in this article:

Why America Is More Dependent Than Ever on Saudi Arabia

"The Saudis are in a great position today," said Jean-François Seznec, a professor at Columbia University's Middle East Institute. "We cannot be enemies with everybody. We need their oil desperately."

Indeed, the alternatives to Saudi Arabia are fewer today than seemed to be the case just three years ago. Predictions of a boom in Iraqi oil have been proved wrong; Iran, OPEC's second-largest oil producer, is locked on a collision course with the West; Venezuela is following an erratic path; and Russia's commitment to market reforms and foreign investments seems increasingly unreliable.


That's some pretty scary, er, stuff. Why they've got us by the balls! They must supply us with 80% of our oil! The real truth is somewhere around 50%.

Gotcha! You probably believed that too you're so scared. The truth is that Saudi Arabia sells us only about 7% of the oil we use everyday. Half comes from our own production and we get roughly the same amount of oil from the Saudis as we do on average from Canada, Mexico and Nigeria which are not even mentioned above. Of the countries that are mentioned, we don't do business with Iran and Russia accounts for less than 1% of what we consume.

Yes, let's reduce our dependence on foreign oil, but let's not pretend that we are "desperate" with regards to any individual source. I won't even go into ANWR.

UPDATE: Here's a few like minded posts which I got from Instapundit.

Big Oil: Saudis Must be Scarier than Canadians

Which Country is Really Dependent?
David Melech Yisrael! Proof?

King David's Palace Is Found, Archaeologist Says

An Israeli archaeologist says she has uncovered in East Jerusalem what may be the fabled palace of the biblical King David. Her work has been sponsored by a conservative Israeli research institute and financed by an American Jewish investment banker who would like to prove that Jerusalem was indeed the capital of the Jewish kingdom described in the Bible.
While the Israeli Jewish community is tearing itself apart over it's decision to continue giving up land for peace (or security), the official Palestinian position is "I want it all and I want it now".

Qurei: Today Gaza, tomorrow Jerusalem

The Israeli withdrawal from the Gaza Strip and the northern West Bank is a step towards liberating Jerusalem, Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Ahmed Qurei declared on Thursday....

Referring to the launching of the first armed attack on Israel by Fatah, Qurei added: "The process that started in 1965 is now making its way, through the strong determination and will of our people, toward Jerusalem, the West Bank and the rest of the homeland."


Burial of Jewish terrorist sparks debates

There should be no debate.

Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz decided to prevent Eden Natan Zada (also known as Eden Tzuberi) from being buried in any military cemetery, saying he is "not worthy of being buried next to fallen soldiers."

Good for him.

The only positive thing that can be said about the reprehensible act that took place the other day is that thank G-d it doesn't happen more often and at least there isn't some nutjob organization claiming responsibility.
Three cheers for Tony Blair.

"They come here and they play by our rules and our way of life," Blair said at his monthly news conference. "If they don't, they are going to have to go."

U.K. Institutes New Deportation Measures

Foreigners who preach hatred, sponsor violence or belong to extremist groups could be deported from Britain under strict new measures that Prime Minister Tony Blair announced Friday, nearly a month after suicide bombers killed 52 people on London's transit system.

Membership in extremist Islamic groups such as Hizb-ut-Tahrir would become a crime under the new measures. The group, which advocates the creation of an Islamic state in Central Asia, already is outlawed in several countries.

Blair said the government also would compile a list of Web sites, bookshops and centers that incite hatred and violence. British nationals involved with such organizations could face strict penalties. Foreign nationals could be deported, he said.


You don't shout fire in a crowded theater, not even as a prank. You don't teach people to kill those who are hosting you in their country either - and they're always serious. There's a word for these types of people in the dictionary - parasite is too good a term - "one who habitually takes advantage of the generosity of others without making any useful return."

In the famous words of Bananarama - Na na na na, na na na na, hey hey, GOODBYE!

Thursday, August 04, 2005

I'm relatively familiar with this case as it's been reported to date, but after reading this two page article, I'm still not sure what it's really about.

Israel Lobbyists Facing Charges in Secrets Case

Two former officials of a pro-Israel lobbying group were charged in an indictment filed Thursday with illegally conspiring to gather and disclose classified national security information to journalists and an unnamed foreign power that government officials identified as Israel.

The indictment accused Steven J. Rosen and Keith Weissman, formerly senior staff members at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, with improperly disclosing national security information beginning in April 1999. The group dismissed the two men last April.
The judge overseeing the case of the AMIA bombing in Argenitna has been impeached. Even a little smidgen of justice in this case is a hopeful sign.

Judge in '94 Buenos Aires blast impeached

BUENOS AIRES -- A federal judge who investigated the 1994 terrorist bombing of a Jewish community center in Buenos Aires was impeached Wednesday, the latest turn in a botched case that has failed to lead to a single conviction and robbed Argentines of the hope for justice.

A nine-member Council of Magistrates found Juan Jose Galeano guilty of ethical and legal violations, particularly of paying a defendant in the case $400,000.

That defendant was expected to implicate several Argentine police officers accused of being the "local connection" in a bombing plot with alleged links to Iran and the Lebanon-based Hezbollah militia. Instead, the case was thrown out last September and all the defendants were freed.


For those who would like a refresher on the terror of July 18, 1994, here's a nice site. In Spanish. Wikipedia in English.
If this is true, it's absolutely disgusting.

NY TIMES INVESTIGATES ADOPTION RECORDS OF SUPREME COURT NOMINEE'S CHILDREN

The DRUDGE REPORT has uncovered a plot in the NEW YORK TIMES' newsroom to look into the adoption records of the children of Supreme Court Nominee John G. Roberts.

The TIMES has investigative reporter Glen Justice hot on the case to investigate adoption records of Judge Roberts’ two young children, Josie age 5 and Jack age 4, a top source reveals.

Judge Roberts and his wife Jane adopted the children when they each were infants.

Both children were adopted from Latin America.

A TIMES insider claims the look into the adoptions records are part of the paper's "standard background check."

Roberts’ young son Jack delighted millions of Americans during his father’s Supreme Court nomination announcement ceremony when he wouldn’t stop dancing while the President and his father spoke to a national television audience.

Previously the WASHINGTON POST Style section had published a story criticizing the outfits Mrs. Roberts had them wear at the announcement ceremony.

One top Washington official with knowledge of the NEW YORK TIMES’ plans declared: “Trying to pry into the lives of the Roberts’ family like this is despicable. Children’s lives should be off limits. The TIMES is putting politics over fundamental decency.”

Wednesday, August 03, 2005

There are some for whom deportation and being stripped of their citizenship would be to easy and would not negate the danger to society.

These two should be imprisoned for life or executed. Nothing less should be acceptable. There is no society, multicultural or otherwise, that can accept as it's members those who openly praise and/or seek the destruction of said society.



As London braces for another feared attack, two prominent British Islamic militants say British civilians are fair targets.

“We don’t live in peace with you anymore,” said Abu Uzair in an interview on BBC Newsnight.

Abu Uzair and Abu Izzadeen — both British citizens — justified and even praised the attacks, which killed 52 people. “What I would say about those who do suicide operations or martyrdom operations — ‘suicide’ is a phrase coined by the media, they’re completely praise-worthy,” said Abu Izzadeen.

Tuesday, August 02, 2005

There are so many ironies in this article that I find it hard to even put together a coherent comment.

New rules for Jews immigrating to Germany, Israel reportedly sought change

The Israeli government, concerned about the declining number of Russian Jews emigrating to Israel, has persuaded Germany to institute unprecedented measures restricting the influx of Jews from the former Soviet Union, according to several Israeli officials.

Prompted by an intense behind-the-scenes lobbying campaign waged by Israel, new immigration rules would grant residence only to Jews from the former Soviet Union who are under 45, fluent in German and financially stable. The rules, announced late last month, do not include Jews from other non- Soviet countries or any other ethnic or religious group. They are expected to take effect at the beginning of next year.
As someone who is flying constantly, the only comment I have on the Air France crash today in Toronto is that each of the flight crew deserve some kind of Medal of Honor for getting everyone out alive.

Only minor injuries as plane skids off runway, catches fire in Toronto




More than 300 passengers and crew on board an Air France flight escaped from a fiery wreck when their plane skidded off the runway on Tuesday afternoon at Toronto's Pearson Airport.

Only 24 people received minor injuries.
Rescue crews trying to extinguish the flames.

The plane, an Airbus A-340-300 was en route from Paris' Charles de Gaulle Airport and was due to arrive in Toronto shortly before 4 p.m. ET. The weather at the time was severe, with high winds, heavy rain and lightning.

Monday, August 01, 2005

If you are a liberal and think you have got your bases covered by buying organic vegetables, free range chicken and fair trade coffee, put down that bottle of water you selfish sonofabitch!

Which child hasn't heard the refrain, "Eat your food...there are children starving in Africa...". Well, here's a new twist from Tom Standage, technology editor of The Economist. Don't drink Evian, there are children dying of thirst in Africa.

Bad to the Last Drop

I find the illogical enthusiasm for bottled water not simply peculiar, but distasteful. For those of us in the developed world, safe water is now so abundant that we can afford to shun the tap water under our noses, and drink bottled water instead: our choice of water has become a lifestyle option. For many people in the developing world, however, access to water remains a matter of life or death.

Hmm, I wonder how may bottles of water they sold at the Live8 concerts?

Under the same logic we should feel guilty every time we buckle up in our cars (you do buckle up, don't you?) because hundreds of millions of people in the Third World rely on bicycles or walk in order to get around.

This is a psychological problem, not a sociopolitical problem.



Hearltess, cruel bastards!