Will someone please explain to me again how this cease-fire thing is supposed to work?
A resumption of Israel's targeted killings of wanted militants, which Israel recently agreed to halt, would likely mean the end of the cease-fire declared by the Israeli and Palestinian leaders at a Feb. 8 summit in Egypt.
How is the "cease-fire" not already broken by yesterday's suicide bombing? Even if the definition of breaking a cease fire is responsing to an attack by the party of the first part, how does lay blame on the party of the second part who is only looking to punish the perpetrator of the origianl attack instead of wantonly killing innocents?
How was the cease-fire not declared broken when rockets were still raining down on Jewish villages in Gaza. or when an Israeli soldier was stabbed?
If the Associated Press is the arbiter of when cease-fires are broken, they are doing a piss-poor job.
At least we don't have to listen to any more of this type of crap. Flashback to 2004 - Arafat hints Israel planted Tel Aviv bomb
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment