Here's France's formula for controlling anti-Semitism. Invest $8bn in Muslim neighborhoods. I guess that French Muslims must have the same level of despair and hopelessness as the Palestinians - which as we all know is the primary cause of anti-Semitism in the world.
I'm sure that in the near future we will hear Muslim parents telling their children, "See we have a new school in our neighborhood - now we don't need to beat Jews in the street anymore!".
Wednesday, November 19, 2003
The New York Times, in an effort to discredit the Bush Administration, quotes two army officals under the banner "Few Signs of Infiltration by Foreign Fighters in Iraq"
Follow this twisted logic - becuase "most of the attacks on our forces are by former regime loyalists and other Iraqis, not foreign forces" and that it one region the army "had captured perhaps (only) 20 foreign fighters trying to slip into the country" therefore it's impossible that Bush could be telling the truth about 1,000-3,000 foreign fighters in Iraq. What does who perpetrates these attacks and a slow trickle of recent arrests translate into a headcount of the existing population of foreign fighters already in Iraq?
If the U.S. Border Patrol arrests 100 Mexican illegals this month, does that disprove that there are millions already living here?
The Times then claims that "the White House has been suggesting that foreign fighters are continuing to enter the country" in order to link "the war in Iraq to the global campaign against terror".
First of all the White House have said that foreign fighters and terrorists have been infiltrating Iraq for a long time and are still trying to get in, not that they are still successful at getting in since obviously we've tightened the border patrols in recent months.
Also, according to an MSNBC report on November 4th: "Senior American officers in Iraq believe foreign fighters are involved in the insurgency now along with Saddam loyalists, but have no firm reason to link them to al-Qaida or any other international terrorist group. Asked at the Pentagon last week about fighters in Iraq from other countries, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said between 200 and 300 people believed to be foreigners have been captured, with a “high percentage� from Syria and Lebanon." That's only who's been captured - Add a multiple for those who haven't been and you easily come to the 1,000 to 3,000 estimate.
Somehow the Times has twisted a story about the success of our border controls in Iraq to prove that the Bush administration is "lying" for the sake of expanding the war on terrorism.
Follow this twisted logic - becuase "most of the attacks on our forces are by former regime loyalists and other Iraqis, not foreign forces" and that it one region the army "had captured perhaps (only) 20 foreign fighters trying to slip into the country" therefore it's impossible that Bush could be telling the truth about 1,000-3,000 foreign fighters in Iraq. What does who perpetrates these attacks and a slow trickle of recent arrests translate into a headcount of the existing population of foreign fighters already in Iraq?
If the U.S. Border Patrol arrests 100 Mexican illegals this month, does that disprove that there are millions already living here?
The Times then claims that "the White House has been suggesting that foreign fighters are continuing to enter the country" in order to link "the war in Iraq to the global campaign against terror".
First of all the White House have said that foreign fighters and terrorists have been infiltrating Iraq for a long time and are still trying to get in, not that they are still successful at getting in since obviously we've tightened the border patrols in recent months.
Also, according to an MSNBC report on November 4th: "Senior American officers in Iraq believe foreign fighters are involved in the insurgency now along with Saddam loyalists, but have no firm reason to link them to al-Qaida or any other international terrorist group. Asked at the Pentagon last week about fighters in Iraq from other countries, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said between 200 and 300 people believed to be foreigners have been captured, with a “high percentage� from Syria and Lebanon." That's only who's been captured - Add a multiple for those who haven't been and you easily come to the 1,000 to 3,000 estimate.
Somehow the Times has twisted a story about the success of our border controls in Iraq to prove that the Bush administration is "lying" for the sake of expanding the war on terrorism.
Tuesday, November 18, 2003
Are there words to describe the evil behind torching a Holocaust museum? Once the police find the people who did this - and they will becuase the arsonists are probably idiots - what kind of programs could possibly exist to transform these "people" into human beings?
Monday, November 17, 2003
It's funny, I've read several reviews about "Full Court Miracle", a new Disney Channel production involving a down on their luck Jewish academy basketball team who hires a down on his luck African American to coach them. They all seem to like it (in the B, B+ range), but they also tend to say it's schmaltzy and predictable. Also, something which I can't stand (a la CBS and Reagan) - this is "based on" a true story. If the real story is so heartwarming, why fix it?
Ironically, it's first showing is on a Friday night, so religious Jews won't be able to watch until it's in repeats.
Ironically, it's first showing is on a Friday night, so religious Jews won't be able to watch until it's in repeats.
One of ours showing his respect for the press corps. Did Dan Rather ever elicit this reaction in Vietnam? Hat Tip: Little Green Footballs.
I don't think this is considered free speech - is it? I mean, can't they be arrested and hanged for treason of some sort?
There's a pretty obvious line between protesting your country's actions and supporting the enemy directly with funds, and these people have crossed it in a Fonzie-like leap over the bodies of their countrymen.
Italian group backs Iraq fighters
There's a pretty obvious line between protesting your country's actions and supporting the enemy directly with funds, and these people have crossed it in a Fonzie-like leap over the bodies of their countrymen.
Italian group backs Iraq fighters
Another house in my new hometown has been designated as a historical landmark. In the article, there is a description of how the home, built in 1898 was lovingly restored by the current owners.
It kind of makes me wonder if anyone would ever want to preserve the modern homes we live in now. Can you imagine the articles 100 years from now? "Mr and Mrs Smith were meticulous in replacing the early 21st century Corian countertops and garden wallpaper in the kitchen. Perhaps most fascinating was the reconstruction of the 'entertainment center' where the original owners used to watch something called 'television' and play music on 'stereos'. Luckily, much of the orignal Bose wiring was found in the attic....."
It kind of makes me wonder if anyone would ever want to preserve the modern homes we live in now. Can you imagine the articles 100 years from now? "Mr and Mrs Smith were meticulous in replacing the early 21st century Corian countertops and garden wallpaper in the kitchen. Perhaps most fascinating was the reconstruction of the 'entertainment center' where the original owners used to watch something called 'television' and play music on 'stereos'. Luckily, much of the orignal Bose wiring was found in the attic....."
Saturday, November 15, 2003
What type of card do I get my wife for World Toilet Day, November 19?
Although I love you tenderly,
I have to say that when I pee
I would do so more merrily
If the seat you would leave up for me.
Copyright - Go Blog and Multiply 2003
Although I love you tenderly,
I have to say that when I pee
I would do so more merrily
If the seat you would leave up for me.
Copyright - Go Blog and Multiply 2003
A new group in England called Shechita UK is trying to prevent the ban of ritual kosher slaughter in that country. Many animal rights organizations in Europe are trying to ban kosher slaughter, as they believe non-kosher methods are more humane (although there is conflicting science on the matter). PETA seems to have nothing to say about this - I guess they're against killing animals for food whatever the method. Here are some other links of note on the subject:
Europe's new face of anti-Semitism: 5 countries now ban production of kosher meat
Fear over European Kosher bans
Halal and Kosher slaughter 'must end'
Swiss retain kosher slaughter ban
Europe's new face of anti-Semitism: 5 countries now ban production of kosher meat
Fear over European Kosher bans
Halal and Kosher slaughter 'must end'
Swiss retain kosher slaughter ban
Another sensless death in New York, although the cause is stupidity, pure and simple.
A Merchant Marine Cadet Is Killed While Subway Surfing
A Merchant Marine Cadet Is Killed While Subway Surfing
INHUMAN BASTARDS. How else do you describe car bombs attacking synagogues on the Sabbath? And one of these was attacked for the third time in 10 years! How do the congregants have the balls to pray there without having a team of green berets outside?
I wonder if the Turks will agonize over this for years just as we Americans do over the bombing of a Birmingham, Alabama church over 40 years ago? I doubt it.
UPDATE: Perhpas a miracle? "It appears that no one inside the synagogue was hurt," said journalist Andrew Finkel, adding that most of those killed were passersby." Not that I'm glad that passersby were killed, but wow.
I wonder if the Turks will agonize over this for years just as we Americans do over the bombing of a Birmingham, Alabama church over 40 years ago? I doubt it.
UPDATE: Perhpas a miracle? "It appears that no one inside the synagogue was hurt," said journalist Andrew Finkel, adding that most of those killed were passersby." Not that I'm glad that passersby were killed, but wow.
Friday, November 14, 2003
James Lileks has a great quote regarding George Soros' comments about President Bush's America and his support for Howard Dean:
"I was tempted to write about George Soros comparing Bush and America to the rise of the Nazis, but I’ve just had it with these people. I’m more interested in those who ride the coattails of their rhetoric. I want someone to ask Dean this question in the Presidential debate: “Governor Dean, one of your wealthiest backers has compared America in 2000s with German in the 1930s. Do you agree with this analogy?� The only acceptable answer to my ears is “No, I don’t.� Period. "
"I was tempted to write about George Soros comparing Bush and America to the rise of the Nazis, but I’ve just had it with these people. I’m more interested in those who ride the coattails of their rhetoric. I want someone to ask Dean this question in the Presidential debate: “Governor Dean, one of your wealthiest backers has compared America in 2000s with German in the 1930s. Do you agree with this analogy?� The only acceptable answer to my ears is “No, I don’t.� Period. "
I have to say I'm kind of glad that the head of the ADL's Interfaith Affairs is leaving. He's the one who's been responsible for all the fire and brimstone surrounding "The Passion", Mel Gibson's upcoming biography on the life of Jesus which some claim to be anti-Semitic.
I am always very uncomfortable when those "in the know" try to tell the public whether something is good or bad before a final product is completed. I also agree that Mr. Gibson got more publicity from the ADL's outrage than a full-page color add in the New York Times. I do believe this was an attempt at censorship which we should never stand for under any circumstances. How the ADL decided to take on one of America's most beloved male actors regarding material that couldn't be seen by the public at large is beyond my comprehension.
I am always very uncomfortable when those "in the know" try to tell the public whether something is good or bad before a final product is completed. I also agree that Mr. Gibson got more publicity from the ADL's outrage than a full-page color add in the New York Times. I do believe this was an attempt at censorship which we should never stand for under any circumstances. How the ADL decided to take on one of America's most beloved male actors regarding material that couldn't be seen by the public at large is beyond my comprehension.
Thursday, November 13, 2003
Here's a neat way to make a small difference in the world. You can also find out at the same time that either the New York Jets and Giants are among the least-loved teams in football, or New Yorkers are incredibly stingy. Go, make the free donation to Campbell Soup's Click-for-Cans campaign and you'll see what I mean.
Speaking of the Jets, can a new football stadium in Manhattan be in the works...for real?
Speaking of the Jets, can a new football stadium in Manhattan be in the works...for real?
Sometimes I think that Thomas Friedman is the most educated level-headed thinker on issues regarding the Middle East. There's other times like today, when I wonder what he's smoking. This is my first offical "fisking" of someone's work. If you don't know what that means, ask me in the comments and I'll be glad to tell you.
Friedman states that "One could easily do a revisionist history of 9/11 and show how it was simply the opening salvo in an attempted coup within Saudi Arabia - with the attack on America meant only as a bank shot to undermine one of the main supports of the Saudi ruling family." And the bombings in Africa, Bali, etc.? These were meant to threaten the Saudi royal family?
He writes further that "Some 26 years ago Anwar Sadat responded to the food riots in Egypt by going to Jerusalem to make peace with Israel." This doesn't seem to have prevented the Egyptian government from sponsoring anti-Semitism and producing miniseries based on the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
But wait there's more - "The way to reduce these fires - which will only worsen with the growth of Muslim populations in Europe - is by forging a solution to the Palestine issue along the lines of the Clinton plan. Nothing would do more to extinguish this new anti-Semitism than an Israeli-Palestinian peace deal". Does he mean the deal that Israel accepted and the Palestinians rejected out of hand?
And now the piece de resistance - "Unfortunately, right now both the House of Saud and the House of Sharon prefer to buy time by relying on police rather than political initiatives. In the long run, this won't work. Both need to take on their Wahhabis: the Muslim Wahhabi extremists who are choking Saudi Arabia's future and the Jewish Wahhabi settlers who are doing the same to Israel. " First he compares the democratically elected Sharon to the House of Saud, then he compares ALL settlers to Wahhabi extremists. I don't remmeber the last time I read about a school in the settlements teaching children to hate their neighbors and declare holy war against all Muslims.
I wonder if he thinks the Palestinians should have a say in any of this?
Friedman states that "One could easily do a revisionist history of 9/11 and show how it was simply the opening salvo in an attempted coup within Saudi Arabia - with the attack on America meant only as a bank shot to undermine one of the main supports of the Saudi ruling family." And the bombings in Africa, Bali, etc.? These were meant to threaten the Saudi royal family?
He writes further that "Some 26 years ago Anwar Sadat responded to the food riots in Egypt by going to Jerusalem to make peace with Israel." This doesn't seem to have prevented the Egyptian government from sponsoring anti-Semitism and producing miniseries based on the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
But wait there's more - "The way to reduce these fires - which will only worsen with the growth of Muslim populations in Europe - is by forging a solution to the Palestine issue along the lines of the Clinton plan. Nothing would do more to extinguish this new anti-Semitism than an Israeli-Palestinian peace deal". Does he mean the deal that Israel accepted and the Palestinians rejected out of hand?
And now the piece de resistance - "Unfortunately, right now both the House of Saud and the House of Sharon prefer to buy time by relying on police rather than political initiatives. In the long run, this won't work. Both need to take on their Wahhabis: the Muslim Wahhabi extremists who are choking Saudi Arabia's future and the Jewish Wahhabi settlers who are doing the same to Israel. " First he compares the democratically elected Sharon to the House of Saud, then he compares ALL settlers to Wahhabi extremists. I don't remmeber the last time I read about a school in the settlements teaching children to hate their neighbors and declare holy war against all Muslims.
I wonder if he thinks the Palestinians should have a say in any of this?
I am NOT little!
"Today, we can say that these little people (Jews) are the root of evil" says Mikis Theodorakis, famous Greek composer as Culture Minister Evangelos Venizelos and Education Minister Petros Efthymiou listen without reaction of any kind.
Another country to add to the Axis of Anti-Semitism with France.
"Today, we can say that these little people (Jews) are the root of evil" says Mikis Theodorakis, famous Greek composer as Culture Minister Evangelos Venizelos and Education Minister Petros Efthymiou listen without reaction of any kind.
Another country to add to the Axis of Anti-Semitism with France.
Wednesday, November 12, 2003
I'm sure that the celebrities mentioned in this article think that their fellow Americans are a caring people, willing to help others in times of distress; that we are strong defenders of freedom and human dignity.
However what they SAY is that we're all dumb as horsesh**. Nice.
However what they SAY is that we're all dumb as horsesh**. Nice.
Thanks to an editorial by Ted Rall, syndicated cartoonist for the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, I see that we've been wrong all along about Iraq - in fact we're just as evil as the Israelis! How could we have sunk so low!
It does fascinate me sometimes how someone who grew up in the same culture as I did has such a different view of the world than I do. We're not talking about having different ideas on how to fund Social Security - I mean seeing the U.S. government as evil and people who blow up Red Cross facilities as brave defenders of freedom? Talk about bizarro world....
It does fascinate me sometimes how someone who grew up in the same culture as I did has such a different view of the world than I do. We're not talking about having different ideas on how to fund Social Security - I mean seeing the U.S. government as evil and people who blow up Red Cross facilities as brave defenders of freedom? Talk about bizarro world....
Nicholas Kristof writes a rare commentary in the NY Times about how the left in this country are heading down the path to incivility and oblivion. From his op-ed piece:
In a fairly typical comment, one reader suggested that President Bush and his aides are "lying, cynical greedy pirates who deserve no better than a firing squad." At this rate, soon we'll all be so rabid that Ann Coulter will seem normal.
That's setting a pretty high bar for obnoxiousness. It's hard to find anyone can surpass it on either side of the political spectrum.
In a fairly typical comment, one reader suggested that President Bush and his aides are "lying, cynical greedy pirates who deserve no better than a firing squad." At this rate, soon we'll all be so rabid that Ann Coulter will seem normal.
That's setting a pretty high bar for obnoxiousness. It's hard to find anyone can surpass it on either side of the political spectrum.
Tuesday, November 11, 2003
Until now, many in Saudi Arabia have supported terrorism against the U.S. since the ends justified the means. Now that they themselves are targets, their attitude seems to be changing.
This is why President Bush is right to call the current conflict a war against terrorism, not just a war against al-Qaeda. Unless terrorism in it's current form is stopped as a viable method of attack everywhere, things are bound to get worse for everyone on the planet. As opposed to the historical call against nuclear weapons use and proliferation which involves established states with some sort of desire for personal survival, the terrorists are actively seeking WMDs and don't care if they live to see the results of their use.
The U.S. isn't going to invade every country that disagrees with us, but if they support terrorists (and you know who you are), we're a-comin to git ya. The push for democracy is just the means by which we hope to deny terrorism a base from which to operate. It ain't altruism that's determining our policy.
This is why President Bush is right to call the current conflict a war against terrorism, not just a war against al-Qaeda. Unless terrorism in it's current form is stopped as a viable method of attack everywhere, things are bound to get worse for everyone on the planet. As opposed to the historical call against nuclear weapons use and proliferation which involves established states with some sort of desire for personal survival, the terrorists are actively seeking WMDs and don't care if they live to see the results of their use.
The U.S. isn't going to invade every country that disagrees with us, but if they support terrorists (and you know who you are), we're a-comin to git ya. The push for democracy is just the means by which we hope to deny terrorism a base from which to operate. It ain't altruism that's determining our policy.
As I walked toward the ferry that would take me to my hotel, I saw down the road this Traffic Light Tree. I'm still not sure if it's a sculpture or a working light, although I think it's the former. You can even see my office building in the background.
Cheerio from London, mate! Nothing much interesting going on here really. However, it is worth noting that the Michael Howard has been appointed as head of the Conservative Party (the Tories). He is the first Jew to head either England's Labour or Conservative parties - Benjamin D'Israeli who was prime minister had been baptized as a child.
Here's a quirk about the British parliamentary system that I love - the opposition party leader selects a "shadow cabinet" to mirror the existing cabinet appointed by the majority party. I think this would be a great idea for the U.S.
Here's a quirk about the British parliamentary system that I love - the opposition party leader selects a "shadow cabinet" to mirror the existing cabinet appointed by the majority party. I think this would be a great idea for the U.S.
Saturday, November 08, 2003
Well I'll be hopping the pond tomorrow and going to merry old England. Let's see what revelries await.....
Prince Charles accused of being homosexual (although British libel laws prevent the publication of much detail) and Is Charles Bisexual?
Cheeky council workers stunned motorists with rude road sign.
All kinds of excitement over Bush's visit the following week - most of it not good.
Prince Charles accused of being homosexual (although British libel laws prevent the publication of much detail) and Is Charles Bisexual?
Cheeky council workers stunned motorists with rude road sign.
All kinds of excitement over Bush's visit the following week - most of it not good.
This is fantastic - a Church Sign Creator on the Internet. You know those signs you pass all the time with the cute sayings to get people to remember to believe in God and go to mass. This site let's you type in any four lines of text and it shows you what it would look like in front of a typical church. it's hard to explain, you just have to go there.
As much as I love books, I rarely spend a lot of money on "coffee table" books. Diaspora, though, seems like one of those that may well be worth it. Here's a nice write-up about it in my local paper, and here's the link to Amazon.com, where it's $30 off.
In constructing Berlin's Holocaust Memorial, is it just ironic or immoral that the company that made Zyklon-B (Degussa) plans to profit from the sale of anti-graffiti spray? To complicate matters, Degussa has supposedly been one of the most forthright companies regarding it's history of wartime activities. Read "The Price of Forgiveness" in today's New York Times.
Friday, November 07, 2003
Now, there could well be a very good reason for a Saudi man and unnamed female companion to be secretly videotaping a Jewish girls middle school, but I'm really stuck to think of a good one.
I would like to think that if I found this couple in my daughter's school that they would not have been able to make it to the parking lot, and boy had they better know how to speak English so that they could tell me exactly how far they would like me to shove that menorah up their....
But I digress.
I would most certainly stay abreast of the situation with the local authorities.
I would like to think that if I found this couple in my daughter's school that they would not have been able to make it to the parking lot, and boy had they better know how to speak English so that they could tell me exactly how far they would like me to shove that menorah up their....
But I digress.
I would most certainly stay abreast of the situation with the local authorities.
Last night I went to see Mary Blye Howe discuss her book "A Baptist Among the Jews" at the local JCC. I had read the book when it came out a couple of months ago and was intrigued by the insights that someone would have learning about Judaism not only from scratch, but with a previously held negative viewpoint.
What I found most interesting were her comments about how in many conservative Baptist churches, Jesus' break with the Pharisees and elders is taught as Jesus the Christian vs. the whole of the Jewish community as opposed to a Jew and his friends disagreeing with other Jews - therefore the thing about "all of us" killing Christ.
There was one woman in the audience who had the most obnoxious question of the night, basically accusing the author of not being able to love both the good in her Christian heritage and her newfound Judaism-based spirituality - telling her she had to choose one or the other but shouldn't claim to be able to enjoy the benefits of both. A lot of dirty looks followed, but no hissing. Mrs. Howe commented basically by saying that acceptance and sorting out of many ideas was better than rejecting everything outside of one's own immediate belief system regardless of what one believes.
In addition, I asked her what I could say to an evangelical Christian to get them to recognize me as a person practicing a valid religion instead of a target for conversion, and she said you can't do anything - they're to set in their ways like machines. That was very disheartening, but she herself had a very difficult time breaking away from that tradition herself and is still ostracized by a large segment of her own community outside of her particular church which is relatively liberal.
The best comment from the audience came when someone said that we should give the book to Children so that they can have a "Jew Among the Jews" experience since so few of us ever explore the various branches of our own faith.
There's a lot to learn here and it will reinforce your love and knowledge for the basic tenets of the religion as practiced by all Jews.
What I found most interesting were her comments about how in many conservative Baptist churches, Jesus' break with the Pharisees and elders is taught as Jesus the Christian vs. the whole of the Jewish community as opposed to a Jew and his friends disagreeing with other Jews - therefore the thing about "all of us" killing Christ.
There was one woman in the audience who had the most obnoxious question of the night, basically accusing the author of not being able to love both the good in her Christian heritage and her newfound Judaism-based spirituality - telling her she had to choose one or the other but shouldn't claim to be able to enjoy the benefits of both. A lot of dirty looks followed, but no hissing. Mrs. Howe commented basically by saying that acceptance and sorting out of many ideas was better than rejecting everything outside of one's own immediate belief system regardless of what one believes.
In addition, I asked her what I could say to an evangelical Christian to get them to recognize me as a person practicing a valid religion instead of a target for conversion, and she said you can't do anything - they're to set in their ways like machines. That was very disheartening, but she herself had a very difficult time breaking away from that tradition herself and is still ostracized by a large segment of her own community outside of her particular church which is relatively liberal.
The best comment from the audience came when someone said that we should give the book to Children so that they can have a "Jew Among the Jews" experience since so few of us ever explore the various branches of our own faith.
There's a lot to learn here and it will reinforce your love and knowledge for the basic tenets of the religion as practiced by all Jews.
Thursday, November 06, 2003
On October 29, I wrote a post about my disappointment in PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) and the tactics they use for what is otherwise an arguably worthy cause.
Earlier today I was going to write about how I was going to boycott McDonald's since the widow of it's founder, Mrs. Ray Kroc bequeathed $200mm to National Palestine (er...Public) Radio.
How are these two linked? PETA to NPR: Reject McDonald's 'Blood Money' Bequest
I am changing course and making sure my wife the vet increases her PETA donation for 2004.
Earlier today I was going to write about how I was going to boycott McDonald's since the widow of it's founder, Mrs. Ray Kroc bequeathed $200mm to National Palestine (er...Public) Radio.
How are these two linked? PETA to NPR: Reject McDonald's 'Blood Money' Bequest
I am changing course and making sure my wife the vet increases her PETA donation for 2004.
On Sunday, November 16th, my shul is having a Mitzvah Day and yours truly is in charge of a project under the auspices of Keep Plano Beautiful. Our task is to clean-up sections of White Rock Creek which for the most part starts in Plano, runs past the shul and south through Dallas. My hope is that we don't have to clean up messes like this one, found in the same creek about 15 miles south.
"DALLAS- A stolen car in a creek bed has yielded the body of an unidentified man and another person, say police who are trying to determine how the two died.
One body found Tuesday inside the car lying in White Rock Creek off Interstate 30 was identified as that of a man. The gender of the other could not be determined because of decomposition. Autopsies were pending."
Yuck.
"DALLAS- A stolen car in a creek bed has yielded the body of an unidentified man and another person, say police who are trying to determine how the two died.
One body found Tuesday inside the car lying in White Rock Creek off Interstate 30 was identified as that of a man. The gender of the other could not be determined because of decomposition. Autopsies were pending."
Yuck.
I have to agree here that this smacks of racism (is it racism if someone is anti-Muslim? Anti-Muslimitic?)
Plan to Make Old Building Into New Mosque Rouses Opposition
How often will you find the Anti-Defamamtion League on the same side of an issue as the Council on American-Islamic Relations?
Plan to Make Old Building Into New Mosque Rouses Opposition
How often will you find the Anti-Defamamtion League on the same side of an issue as the Council on American-Islamic Relations?
Wednesday, November 05, 2003
The NY Times just posted a story on their website that is either the biggest story since Watergate or the final deathblow for their claims to objectivity - Iraq Said to Have Tried to Reach Last-Minute Deal to Avert War
"As American soldiers massed on the Iraqi border in March and diplomats argued about war, an influential adviser to the Pentagon received a secret message from a Lebanese-American businessman: Saddam Hussein wanted to make a deal.
Iraqi officials, including the chief of the Iraqi Intelligence Service, had told the businessman that they wanted Washington to know that Iraq no longer had weapons of mass destruction, and they offered to allow American troops and experts to conduct a search. The businessman said in an interview that the Iraqis also offered to hand over a man accused of being involved in the World Trade Center bombing in 1993 who was being held in Baghdad. At one point, he said, the Iraqis pledged to hold elections."
Is this for real? If it is then it's an incredible cover-up. If it's not, then it's the biggest piece of political propaganda ever to appear in the "news" section of a major newspaper.
I guess we'll see tomorrow.
"As American soldiers massed on the Iraqi border in March and diplomats argued about war, an influential adviser to the Pentagon received a secret message from a Lebanese-American businessman: Saddam Hussein wanted to make a deal.
Iraqi officials, including the chief of the Iraqi Intelligence Service, had told the businessman that they wanted Washington to know that Iraq no longer had weapons of mass destruction, and they offered to allow American troops and experts to conduct a search. The businessman said in an interview that the Iraqis also offered to hand over a man accused of being involved in the World Trade Center bombing in 1993 who was being held in Baghdad. At one point, he said, the Iraqis pledged to hold elections."
Is this for real? If it is then it's an incredible cover-up. If it's not, then it's the biggest piece of political propaganda ever to appear in the "news" section of a major newspaper.
I guess we'll see tomorrow.
I have an idea for a trade - the Saudis send us much needed oil and we send them much needed sand. Seriously.
This comes from a new site called Yahweh is in the House, a semi-parody of Allah is in the House.
This comes from a new site called Yahweh is in the House, a semi-parody of Allah is in the House.
Tuesday, November 04, 2003
If you want me to believe in astrology and fortune telling, then tell me who could have predicted these three improbable stories:
The Wall Street Journal has an editorial "In Defense of P. Diddy".
Al Sharpton will be hosting Saturday Night Live.
Knicks win.
The Wall Street Journal has an editorial "In Defense of P. Diddy".
Al Sharpton will be hosting Saturday Night Live.
Knicks win.
Monday, November 03, 2003
Tell me that this would not be the most highly watched pay-per-view event in world history:
The Grand Prior of the Knights Templar of the US challenges Osama bin Laden to a duel by sword.
From the challenge - "I will come to you alone, a single knight amidst thousands of your followers. You can have me killed in front of your followers . . . but then, of course, your reputation as a coward and an infidel will be sealed for all eternity."
Cool.
The Grand Prior of the Knights Templar of the US challenges Osama bin Laden to a duel by sword.
From the challenge - "I will come to you alone, a single knight amidst thousands of your followers. You can have me killed in front of your followers . . . but then, of course, your reputation as a coward and an infidel will be sealed for all eternity."
Cool.
There will be a total lunar eclipse this coming Saturday night, November 8. Wouldn't it have been really cool if there was an eclipse on Halloween?
Sunday, November 02, 2003
This is what makes me proud to be a Jew - 60 Minutes has a segment tonight about Hadassah Hospital in Jerusalem and how they deliver the exact same level of care to Israelis and Palestinians alike - even suicide bombers. The sacred value of human life is respected over all other concerns.
I plan on sending them a donation, which I should have done long ago. Please join me. I've started a section of links on the right to my favorite charities. Don't see that on too many blogs...
I plan on sending them a donation, which I should have done long ago. Please join me. I've started a section of links on the right to my favorite charities. Don't see that on too many blogs...
Many have posted this before me, but there is a great synopsis of the history of Anti-Semitism here written by Natan Sharansky. Mr Sharansky, as many of you know was the best known Russian Jew (refusenik) who eventually emigrated to Israel and became a member of the Knesset.
You have to read the whole thing, but it's interesting that he notes is that virulent anti-Semitism existed with or without Israel, in lands with or without Jewish inhabitants, and in societies both free and repressed.
You have to read the whole thing, but it's interesting that he notes is that virulent anti-Semitism existed with or without Israel, in lands with or without Jewish inhabitants, and in societies both free and repressed.
Saturday, November 01, 2003
I find it amusing that the New York Time's hatred for Rush Limbaugh is so complete that in their article about radio personality Delilah the author writes the following:
"Delilah, with her audience of millions, has said that she's the anti-Howard Stern; she's also the anti-Rush Limbaugh, extremely female in a male-dominated medium and genre."
That in itself is not so bad inasmuch as it's accurate - but the caption on the picture they show on the website labels Delilah as "the anti-Limbaugh", using the author's description of her instead of her own description as the anti-Stern. I guess the editors feel that the author knows more about how Delilah should be defined than Delilah herself.
By the way, my wife's been listening to Delilah for months and loves her show. I'm hoping her empathy for the calling audience rests in her past relationships with men and not with me!
"Delilah, with her audience of millions, has said that she's the anti-Howard Stern; she's also the anti-Rush Limbaugh, extremely female in a male-dominated medium and genre."
That in itself is not so bad inasmuch as it's accurate - but the caption on the picture they show on the website labels Delilah as "the anti-Limbaugh", using the author's description of her instead of her own description as the anti-Stern. I guess the editors feel that the author knows more about how Delilah should be defined than Delilah herself.
By the way, my wife's been listening to Delilah for months and loves her show. I'm hoping her empathy for the calling audience rests in her past relationships with men and not with me!
This is the kind of thing that you always think would never happen in a Jewish school:
Students at Private Jewish High School in LA Expelled for Making Sex Video
According to the article -"The video was made last spring by a sophomore girl and two junior boys, who were not identified by officials with Milken Community High School. Two of the three students involved thought the video was recorded only for a small group of friends, said school head Rennie Wrubel." This means that one of the students was planning to distribute this to the whole school. That makes him (I'll assume it wasn't the girl) an incredible jerk as well as a distributor of child porn.
The synagogue that sponsors the school, the Stephen S. Wise Temple is also one of the most liberal Reform synagogues in the country. I think it's funny that they have to advertise their services as "Shabbat A.M." as if it were "Good Morning America".
Students at Private Jewish High School in LA Expelled for Making Sex Video
According to the article -"The video was made last spring by a sophomore girl and two junior boys, who were not identified by officials with Milken Community High School. Two of the three students involved thought the video was recorded only for a small group of friends, said school head Rennie Wrubel." This means that one of the students was planning to distribute this to the whole school. That makes him (I'll assume it wasn't the girl) an incredible jerk as well as a distributor of child porn.
The synagogue that sponsors the school, the Stephen S. Wise Temple is also one of the most liberal Reform synagogues in the country. I think it's funny that they have to advertise their services as "Shabbat A.M." as if it were "Good Morning America".
Friday, October 31, 2003
If there's anyone out there who's participated in one of those "US Out of Iraq - No Blood for Oil" protests, I hope you meet the poor souls in this video in the afterlife so that you can explain how you helped them by delaying the overthrow of Saddam Hussein. Oh yeah, and don't foget these people, and these.
And if you are so inclined to believe that this is some Fox News style right-wing propaganda, here's a link on CNN to the same story. (Although they seem to have pulled it from their U.S. homepage at cnn.com where it was earlier - it's on their international site). Must be that we Americans are too sensitive.
And if you are so inclined to believe that this is some Fox News style right-wing propaganda, here's a link on CNN to the same story. (Although they seem to have pulled it from their U.S. homepage at cnn.com where it was earlier - it's on their international site). Must be that we Americans are too sensitive.
Will someone explain to me how you get $1.8mm in severance pay for doing nothing?
From the New York Times: "Boston University's trustees and Daniel S. Goldin, the former NASA chief they had chosen to be the university's next president, parted ways today, with Mr. Goldin receiving what amounted to a reported $1.8 million severance payment for a job he was one day away from beginning."
Remind me not to send my kids to the Boston U. Business School.
Howard
From the New York Times: "Boston University's trustees and Daniel S. Goldin, the former NASA chief they had chosen to be the university's next president, parted ways today, with Mr. Goldin receiving what amounted to a reported $1.8 million severance payment for a job he was one day away from beginning."
Remind me not to send my kids to the Boston U. Business School.
Howard
If you've got a couple of hours to spare, here's a link to Little Green Footballs that itself links to a videotaped session of a Senate Subcommittee hearing on the education of Palestinian children that was shown on C-Span earlier today. I don't think the concern deals with the debate on teaching creationism versus evolution in biology class... (it's more having to do with the debate whether the Jews are more like pigs or monkeys?)
Here's a wonderful site with suggestions for Muslim mullahs to use for their Friday sermons. I like the part about "The Jews, who are the nation of pigs and monkeys, are nothing but a source of evil, corruption, tribulation and war.". All from the Religion of Peace. Does this site look like it was put together by poor people who are living a desperate life? Hardly.
I swear that I want to believe that this is not the majority Muslim opinion, I really do. But if you think this is the only site like this, you just haven't been paying attention.
Here's a wonderful site with suggestions for Muslim mullahs to use for their Friday sermons. I like the part about "The Jews, who are the nation of pigs and monkeys, are nothing but a source of evil, corruption, tribulation and war.". All from the Religion of Peace. Does this site look like it was put together by poor people who are living a desperate life? Hardly.
I swear that I want to believe that this is not the majority Muslim opinion, I really do. But if you think this is the only site like this, you just haven't been paying attention.
Just saw an article about another poll that shows that our friends in Europe do indeed hate Israel (I'm being careful not to say Jews). According to a poll taken of European residents, 59% of respondents said that Israel is the biggest threat to world peace. I don't know whether to be upset or proud that a little country of 6 million, 20% or so which is not even Jewish can create such a fearsome image in the world.
That doesn't mean they're anti-Semitic or biased you say? OK. What exactly makes a country the "biggest" threat to world peace. Support of terrorism against innocent victims? I think the that supporters of radical Islam win that contest hands down (see 9/11, Bali, African embassy bombings, etc.). How about massive military might and visible placement of nuclear missiles? I don't think Israel is quite on par with the US, Russia, China or NATO in general to name a few.
What singles Israel out then as the worst of the worst? Could it be bias?
The fact is that Israel has had to spend most of it's 50+ years taking in millions of immigrants from the rest of the world because everyone treats the Jews like crap. And then that same world community turns around and says that Israelis are horrible because they don't lay down their arms and die, or better yet just go away. As my grandpa used to say----feh!
That doesn't mean they're anti-Semitic or biased you say? OK. What exactly makes a country the "biggest" threat to world peace. Support of terrorism against innocent victims? I think the that supporters of radical Islam win that contest hands down (see 9/11, Bali, African embassy bombings, etc.). How about massive military might and visible placement of nuclear missiles? I don't think Israel is quite on par with the US, Russia, China or NATO in general to name a few.
What singles Israel out then as the worst of the worst? Could it be bias?
The fact is that Israel has had to spend most of it's 50+ years taking in millions of immigrants from the rest of the world because everyone treats the Jews like crap. And then that same world community turns around and says that Israelis are horrible because they don't lay down their arms and die, or better yet just go away. As my grandpa used to say----feh!
Just a note to all you Dennis Miller fans - he's going to have his own show again - this time on CNBC at a reasonable hour.
Thursday, October 30, 2003
Norm Geras has a great entry in his blog dealing with anti-Semitism, anti-Americanism and the poisoned atmosphere of left-wing political discourse in the U.K. Believe me, our Democrats are fascists compared to the left-wing of the Labour Party. I wish I had the time to write entries at length, as he and others do.
I actually have to go to London on business shortly - I hope that nobody berates me in the street if they find out I'm a Jewish American.
I actually have to go to London on business shortly - I hope that nobody berates me in the street if they find out I'm a Jewish American.
This picture of George Bush is hilarious. The Drudge Report has it up now on the top of it's site and it's even funnier there.
He is risen, indeed.
He is risen, indeed.
I'm willing to listen if anyone has a suggestion other than the Death Penalty for this guy - Man Plows Stolen Pickup Through Motorcyclists on Highway; Two Dead, One Critical.
What I love is the last line of the article:
"Police early Thursday said they had no information on whether Pilgren had been jailed."
If the police don't know, who does? And if he's not in jail, will someone please let me know where he is so I can get out of his way?
What I love is the last line of the article:
"Police early Thursday said they had no information on whether Pilgren had been jailed."
If the police don't know, who does? And if he's not in jail, will someone please let me know where he is so I can get out of his way?
Wednesday, October 29, 2003
On PETA - the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals: I think any moral human being has to agree with their underlying premise - abuse of animals is horrible and abusing animals only to fulfill the human lust for pleasure is worse. Nevertheless I really dislike them. I dislike them even more for making me dislike them. It's hard to root for an organization that uses the Holocaust as propaganda and tries to indoctrinate middle-school children with a passion only the cigarette companies can match.
It's a damn shame.
It's a damn shame.
If you think there needs to be a debate about the legality of radar detectors, how about the use of electronic traffic light changers. Hat tip to my brother-in-law.
This reminds me of a trick I've played on people once or twice (when it's safe to do so of course). If you find yourself in the passenger seat of a car while sitting at a red light, start a conversation with the driver. Before the light turns green, point to the light and say "it's green, go ahead". You'd be surprised how many people look at the light and because they trust what you said, start to cross the intersection even though they look up and see the red light themselves. Again, please don't do this in Times Square at rush hour.
This reminds me of a trick I've played on people once or twice (when it's safe to do so of course). If you find yourself in the passenger seat of a car while sitting at a red light, start a conversation with the driver. Before the light turns green, point to the light and say "it's green, go ahead". You'd be surprised how many people look at the light and because they trust what you said, start to cross the intersection even though they look up and see the red light themselves. Again, please don't do this in Times Square at rush hour.
Apparently there's a new sandwich chain that's expanding in the Dallas area called Cousin's Subs. According to the Dallas Business Journal, they're based in Milwaukee and are looking to open around 30 locations in the Dallas area. I didn't even realize that there was one pretty close to me - maybe I'll give it a shot...you can even get a coupon from their website. If you really like their food and are ready to quit that day job, they're having a franchising seminar in Addison on November 11th.
Tuesday, October 28, 2003
To me this is one of the funnier headlines I've read in the New York Times in awhile - "Permanent Government to Be Formed, Palestinians Say". It made me laugh not because of the oxymoron of a Permanent Palestinian Government, but it reminded me of a song from the old Broadway show Guys and Dolls about the "Oldest Establsihed Permanent Floating Crap Game in New York"
Monday, October 27, 2003
For those of you in the Dallas area, Mark Davis from WBAP 820-AM will be speaking this Wednesday at 7:30PM at Temple Emanu-El about his one week trip to Israel back in August. You can see his diary from that trip along with some photos at his website.
I didn't really pay much attention to his radio show until I heard he was going there. However, both before, during and after his trip he sounded so excited that it reminded me about how I felt (and in some ways still feel) about my first trip when I was 16 on USY Pilgrimage. Of course it costs two and half times more to go now than it did in 1982!
I'll let y'all know how his presentation goes (assuming the wife lets me out of the house).
I didn't really pay much attention to his radio show until I heard he was going there. However, both before, during and after his trip he sounded so excited that it reminded me about how I felt (and in some ways still feel) about my first trip when I was 16 on USY Pilgrimage. Of course it costs two and half times more to go now than it did in 1982!
I'll let y'all know how his presentation goes (assuming the wife lets me out of the house).
You know, if Yasser Arafat can win the Nobel Prize, certainly the Committee will have no problem if I suggest Jennifer Aniston, Brad Pitt and Danny DeVito. Do you think this is serious?....After Tony and Kofi fail, Brad and Jennifer try Mid-East diplomacy.
Sunday, October 26, 2003
OK, one more chauvinist comment. When I was younger, I would pray to see a naked woman. Actually, it was worse - I would pray to see any part of a woman naked. How does a nebbish like Spencer Tunick, get 450 women to say, OK not only do I want to get naked in front of you, I want to do it on a cold hard marble floor that has been walked on by millions of pairs of filthy footwear for the past 80 years. Austin Powers, eat your heart out.
When I was in Little Rock yesterday, I went to the Central High School Museum and Visitor Center. If you're not aware, this was the place of one of the nastiest battles to integrate the nation's schools. I learned a lot of interesting facts such as that Arkansas' public universities were already desegregated at the time...that Little Rock built a new "black" high school so that they could show that the blacks would want to go there and not Central.
After seeing newsreels my whole life of the National Guard troops, the taunting of the new kids just trying to go to school, etc. it was really strange being there in person. Also, growing up in New York, Arkansas was like another world - somewhere I'd probably never see and couldn't imagine wanting to. It also felt awkward driving through what is obviously a poor African-American community to take pictures of something that must bring back such terrible(?) memories. Maybe that's what it's like for a non-Jew to visit Holocaust museums and the like. You almost want to apologize even though you weren't born when everything happened.
By the way, the Arkansas Governor's mansion, where Bill Clinton lived, is pretty much within walking distance of Central High. It is also strangely located in the middle of a poverty stricken part of town.
Say what you will about Bill Clinton, but the man was GOVERNOR of a state when he was 32! And he looked only 25! Man, no wonder he got all the chicks.
After seeing newsreels my whole life of the National Guard troops, the taunting of the new kids just trying to go to school, etc. it was really strange being there in person. Also, growing up in New York, Arkansas was like another world - somewhere I'd probably never see and couldn't imagine wanting to. It also felt awkward driving through what is obviously a poor African-American community to take pictures of something that must bring back such terrible(?) memories. Maybe that's what it's like for a non-Jew to visit Holocaust museums and the like. You almost want to apologize even though you weren't born when everything happened.
By the way, the Arkansas Governor's mansion, where Bill Clinton lived, is pretty much within walking distance of Central High. It is also strangely located in the middle of a poverty stricken part of town.
Say what you will about Bill Clinton, but the man was GOVERNOR of a state when he was 32! And he looked only 25! Man, no wonder he got all the chicks.
One of the principal targets of the Texas Republican's redistricting plan is U.S. representative Martin Frost - Democrat representing district 24. Representative Frost is THE pro-Israel representative from Texas and should be supported in the upcoming elections. According to the Dallas News, Representative Frost is not about to give up his seat, even though his district will now contain a significant Republican majority.
I've seen this man speak at AIPAC events and he's received numerous awards from the Jewish community. Let's hope he stays around, even if he has to run in another district.
I've seen this man speak at AIPAC events and he's received numerous awards from the Jewish community. Let's hope he stays around, even if he has to run in another district.
Friday, October 24, 2003
I should have known that our cabin by th elake in Arkansas wouldn't have a telephone line, much less hi-spedd internet access. Posting his from a cafe in Hot Springs - will hopefully get back on tonight in a more modern setting.
Hope I haven't missed much - heard something about the Yankees being behind but that's rediculous......
Hope I haven't missed much - heard something about the Yankees being behind but that's rediculous......
Tuesday, October 21, 2003
Paul Krugman of the New York Times publishes the usual garbage about them (i.e., "the Muslim world") hating us (Americans and Jews) because of the policies of George Bush. I hate to have to defend Bush, but just as I'll say that Bill Clinton was unfairly attacked for political gain, anybody who says that Muslim countries hate us because of George Bush is an idiot. Think back to the OPEC Oil Embargo, the Iranian Hostage Crisis and the Beirut barracks bombing and I think you've got a pretty good legacy of acts of war against this country (unanswered mind you) while George Bush was still deciding what he wanted to do when he grew up.
Personally, if there are people who feel they need to use hate to advance their political agendas, my goal in life would not be to appease them or understand their motives, but to hate them back and kill them if they ever came near by wife and children. There is no room in this world for prime ministers of countries of tens of millions of people saying things such as "Jews run the world" and must be defeated. No excuses. For crying out loud, the guy is retiring soon - there is absolutely no need to have made those remarks. Krugman thinks Mahathir's just a shrewd politician. Hitler was playing to his constituents also because they had a crappy economy.
You know what, now that I understand why Hitler used anti-Semitism the way he did, I don't hate him anymore. He was just being reasonable after all! What else could he be expected to do with a country to run and all those evil Jews running the world ?!?
I want to throw up.
Update: I am glad to see there are others as outraged as I am: Once again, the hard work is done by Little Green Footballs.
Personally, if there are people who feel they need to use hate to advance their political agendas, my goal in life would not be to appease them or understand their motives, but to hate them back and kill them if they ever came near by wife and children. There is no room in this world for prime ministers of countries of tens of millions of people saying things such as "Jews run the world" and must be defeated. No excuses. For crying out loud, the guy is retiring soon - there is absolutely no need to have made those remarks. Krugman thinks Mahathir's just a shrewd politician. Hitler was playing to his constituents also because they had a crappy economy.
You know what, now that I understand why Hitler used anti-Semitism the way he did, I don't hate him anymore. He was just being reasonable after all! What else could he be expected to do with a country to run and all those evil Jews running the world ?!?
I want to throw up.
Update: I am glad to see there are others as outraged as I am: Once again, the hard work is done by Little Green Footballs.
I can't believe that a second year has gone by and I didn't get a chance to go to the Texas State Fair which is a month long event. Last year it was because we had just moved and this year it was because we just had a baby. I'm looking forward to 2004!
Why the big fuss? Where else can you find such local delicacies as fried Snickers on a stick?
Why the big fuss? Where else can you find such local delicacies as fried Snickers on a stick?
You've probably seen reports like this one, about how Germany's Jewish population is on the rise. What is more interesting to me is why these people are going to Germany, although in Jerry Seinfeld's words - "not that there's anything wrong with that".
The article says that many are fleeing from the Ukraine, Russia, etc. and going to Germany because it's close. If that were indeed the case, what makes these immigrants so different from those of 100 years ago like my great-grandparents who took an enormously more difficult trip to the U.S.? I'm assuming that it's because German immigration policies are much more open than our own nowadays. Based on recent reports, it seems that we here could use an influx of immigrants to bolster the American Jewish community.
It is also a sad commentary on the situation in Israel that having decided to leave their home country, many Jews prefer the colder climate of Europe to the balmy Mediterranean. I would like to think that if I ever felt that I had to leave the United States that Israel would be my principal option. Then again, the U.S. isn't the Ukraine where I'm sure almost anywhere else would make for a better life.
Then again, maybe there is hope for the Ukraine. I just read that a Holocaust Museum and Jewish Education Center is to be built there.
In any case, good luck to them all.
The article says that many are fleeing from the Ukraine, Russia, etc. and going to Germany because it's close. If that were indeed the case, what makes these immigrants so different from those of 100 years ago like my great-grandparents who took an enormously more difficult trip to the U.S.? I'm assuming that it's because German immigration policies are much more open than our own nowadays. Based on recent reports, it seems that we here could use an influx of immigrants to bolster the American Jewish community.
It is also a sad commentary on the situation in Israel that having decided to leave their home country, many Jews prefer the colder climate of Europe to the balmy Mediterranean. I would like to think that if I ever felt that I had to leave the United States that Israel would be my principal option. Then again, the U.S. isn't the Ukraine where I'm sure almost anywhere else would make for a better life.
Then again, maybe there is hope for the Ukraine. I just read that a Holocaust Museum and Jewish Education Center is to be built there.
In any case, good luck to them all.
Monday, October 20, 2003
Apologies to those who've noticed a slowdown in postings. We just had a baby a month ago and now that grandma has gone back home, we're still trying to figure out what to do with the little one and her big sister. I'll be going on several trips soon which will actually give me more time to think and post. Please stay tuned.
By the way, if you don't go to shul regularly and were thinking about starting, now's a good a time as any...we read the very first parsha of the Torah this Shabbos - Breishit. You know, "In the beginning...., etc."
We're going to be in Arkansas this weekend doing some leaf peeping. Maybe we'll see if we can't find some MOTs (Members of the Tribe) for a little Shabbat action, even if it's Chabad in Little Rock.
By the way, if you don't go to shul regularly and were thinking about starting, now's a good a time as any...we read the very first parsha of the Torah this Shabbos - Breishit. You know, "In the beginning...., etc."
We're going to be in Arkansas this weekend doing some leaf peeping. Maybe we'll see if we can't find some MOTs (Members of the Tribe) for a little Shabbat action, even if it's Chabad in Little Rock.
Saturday, October 18, 2003
Great post at a website called Jessica's Well. Look at the entry for October 16 which links to Life Magazine articles from six months after WWII saying things like - "We have swept away Hitlerism, but a great many Europeans feel that the cure has been worse than the disease." Sounds like criticism of our war in Iraq today, doesn't it? I'm now even more confident that things will work out just fine in the long run.
Friday, October 17, 2003
OK - think of the most bizarre thing that could possibly happen to you.
Now read about the Jewish couple in Minnesota that had the artist formerly known as Prince knock on their door to try to convert them....on Kol Nidre night!
Now read about the Jewish couple in Minnesota that had the artist formerly known as Prince knock on their door to try to convert them....on Kol Nidre night!
You know, it's really sad that there is so much blatant, published anti-semitism in the world that I have to post a link to someone who's taken the time out to do a summary of recent anti-semitic events and comments made by public officials. Hat tip to www.jewschool.com.
As the author states at the end - "How can any self-repsecting Jew honestly be anti-Zionist? Really?"
As the author states at the end - "How can any self-repsecting Jew honestly be anti-Zionist? Really?"
At the Organization of the Islamic Conference taking place in Malaysia, the prime minister of that country told the attendees that "The Europeans killed 6 million Jews out of 12 million, but today the Jews rule the world by proxy," Mahathir said, opening the meeting of Islamic leaders from 57 nations. "They get others to fight and die for them."
He further urged the Islamic World to "unite, using nonviolent means for a "final victory." Sounds like Final Solution - doesn't it? Maybe it's OK to just try to starve all the Jews to death instead of buring them in ovens?
Our good friend Hamid Karzai, the leader of Afghanistan hand-picked by the US had this to say - "It is great to hear Prime Minister Mahathir speak so eloquently on the problems of the ummah (Muslim world) and ways to remedy them," Karzai said. "His speech was an eye-opener to a lot of us and that is what the Islamic world should do."
See the whole article from USA Today here.
He further urged the Islamic World to "unite, using nonviolent means for a "final victory." Sounds like Final Solution - doesn't it? Maybe it's OK to just try to starve all the Jews to death instead of buring them in ovens?
Our good friend Hamid Karzai, the leader of Afghanistan hand-picked by the US had this to say - "It is great to hear Prime Minister Mahathir speak so eloquently on the problems of the ummah (Muslim world) and ways to remedy them," Karzai said. "His speech was an eye-opener to a lot of us and that is what the Islamic world should do."
See the whole article from USA Today here.
Thursday, October 16, 2003
With friends like Ann Coulter, who needs enemies? I really do despise most of what this woman writes, and to prove it I am including a link to an anti-Coulter site.
That being said, I have been a fan of Rush Limbaugh because I do believe that regardless of how egotistical he comes across in his show, he can be critical and funny without too much name calling - as opposed to Ann Coulter.
However, I do want to comment on some quotes pulled from the Coulter piece:
"Inasmuch as liberals have no morals, they can sit back and criticize other people for failing to meet the standards that liberals simply renounce." OK, I don't agree with the first part - that's the kind of thing that makes me dislike Ann so much. The second part though is important - we don't hear now how if we only ended the War on Drugs and decriminalized "recreational" use Rush and other innocents wouldn't be in this unnecessary predicament. No! It's "shame on him - he's as bad as a heroin addict driving a bus full of children!" Send him away!
Here's another interesting quote:
'Liberals can lie under oath in legal proceedings and it's a "personal matter." Conservatives must scream their every failing from the rooftops or they are "liars".' You know who she's talking about...and I'm sure this is too broad a generalization,..or is it?
That being said, I have been a fan of Rush Limbaugh because I do believe that regardless of how egotistical he comes across in his show, he can be critical and funny without too much name calling - as opposed to Ann Coulter.
However, I do want to comment on some quotes pulled from the Coulter piece:
"Inasmuch as liberals have no morals, they can sit back and criticize other people for failing to meet the standards that liberals simply renounce." OK, I don't agree with the first part - that's the kind of thing that makes me dislike Ann so much. The second part though is important - we don't hear now how if we only ended the War on Drugs and decriminalized "recreational" use Rush and other innocents wouldn't be in this unnecessary predicament. No! It's "shame on him - he's as bad as a heroin addict driving a bus full of children!" Send him away!
Here's another interesting quote:
'Liberals can lie under oath in legal proceedings and it's a "personal matter." Conservatives must scream their every failing from the rooftops or they are "liars".' You know who she's talking about...and I'm sure this is too broad a generalization,..or is it?
Wednesday, October 15, 2003
No more Jews in Baghdad. Would you believe that 100 years ago a quarter of Baghdad was Jewish? Hmmm, now why would they all leave like that? We know that Islam is the Religion of Peace and Love....or is it, kufr?
TRAGIC. How do people go to work in this city, not knowing whether they'll come home alive or not? I think I'll start posting every time someone in NY meets a random, untimely death. Here's one from this weekend.
What is the price that people are willing to pay to live around here? How many millions put their lives in the hands of others every day? Who remembers the Brooklyn subway crash that lead to 100 deaths? How about any of these (which has not been updated and may not be complete)?
I swear that I love NY even though I left - but in a place where only the sky is the limit for people's dreams, the tragedies are all that more profound.
What is the price that people are willing to pay to live around here? How many millions put their lives in the hands of others every day? Who remembers the Brooklyn subway crash that lead to 100 deaths? How about any of these (which has not been updated and may not be complete)?
I swear that I love NY even though I left - but in a place where only the sky is the limit for people's dreams, the tragedies are all that more profound.
Tuesday, October 14, 2003
Is it any wonder that innocent Palestinian children die when they do something so sensless as to provide background cover for their comrades with guns? It's been 3 years and countless dead and they still think it's a fun idea to hang around during a firefight? Hat Tip to Little Green Footballs.
Monday, October 13, 2003
I would never claim that individual Palestinians don't suffer due to Israel's hunt to destroy terrorists and their operations. However, it's hard to react to those claims when the reporting of their extent vary so wildly and in many cases fallaciously.
One report in the left leaning Ha'Aretz claims that 2,000 Palestinians were left homeless by this past week's actions by the Israeli army to destroy tunnels used for smuggling arms, people, etc, from Egypt into Gaza.
Today a report by the Associated Press with a headline of "almost 1,500" homeless actually uses a figure of 1,240 in the body of the article. If 1,240 is almost 1,500, then 200 is almost 500.
This reminds me of Operation Defensive Shield in Jenin in 2002 when Palestinian cabinet member Nabil Shaath claimed hundreds of civilians killed in a massacre perpetrated by the Israel Defense Forces. A more sober accounting by the U.N. determined that almost as many Israeli soldiers died (23) as Palestinian civilians (maybe up to half of the 52 Palestinians killed in the fighting). This of course does not mention the 29 Israelis killed at a Passover Seder just before that.
Update: Now the Associate Press is reporting "hundreds" of homeless. So we've gone from 2,000 to "hundreds". Anybody willing to bet on a drop to "dozens" in the next 24 hours?
One report in the left leaning Ha'Aretz claims that 2,000 Palestinians were left homeless by this past week's actions by the Israeli army to destroy tunnels used for smuggling arms, people, etc, from Egypt into Gaza.
Today a report by the Associated Press with a headline of "almost 1,500" homeless actually uses a figure of 1,240 in the body of the article. If 1,240 is almost 1,500, then 200 is almost 500.
This reminds me of Operation Defensive Shield in Jenin in 2002 when Palestinian cabinet member Nabil Shaath claimed hundreds of civilians killed in a massacre perpetrated by the Israel Defense Forces. A more sober accounting by the U.N. determined that almost as many Israeli soldiers died (23) as Palestinian civilians (maybe up to half of the 52 Palestinians killed in the fighting). This of course does not mention the 29 Israelis killed at a Passover Seder just before that.
Update: Now the Associate Press is reporting "hundreds" of homeless. So we've gone from 2,000 to "hundreds". Anybody willing to bet on a drop to "dozens" in the next 24 hours?
Saturday, October 11, 2003
Emma Thomson is one of my favorite actresses. Maybe it's the accent, or maybe it's just that she's one of the few actresses that seems to have a brain - again this may be an illusion based on the accent, but I don't think so. Anyway, that's why I'm so excited that she's agreed to take the role of Professor Trelawney in the upcoming movie version of "Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban".
This blog is starting to need a serious dose of silliness after so much discussion of serious topics. It's good to see that there are people who have so few cares in the world, and so much free time on their hands, that they spend the majority of their life grooming their cats.
The LA Times has printed a report claiming that Israel now has sea-based nuclear missiles. I guess Israel needs them to protect themselves from followers of people like NYU professor Tony Judt, published yesterday in the same newspaper who calls for an end to the Jewish state.
This is my latest e-mail to Ray Hanania. Here I am responding to a request of his to comment on a pro-Israel readers' irate and personal attack on him based on what he had written in his column, also posted below:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here are my thoughts as you have requested:
First of all, even if this person had a good point, there is no room in civilized discourse to say things like, "As any educated person would know..." and claiming that your words incited anti-semitic acts. That's just not right. Now, I'll try and get into the mind of this person and explain what made him so irate.
When I read your article and saw that you said "Zionism...declares that Israel must be exclusively Jewish" that got my dander up too. In fact, I would say it was that one line that sparked this whole conversation we're having. Let's say that I and the other writer disagree with your statement...why does it upset us so, instead of just making us shake our heads? Your statement brings to mind, unintentionally I'm sure, the litany of prejudices about Jews setting themselves apart from everyone else because they feel they're better than non-Jews. This is often a false impression that is given by religious Jews who refuse to eat other's food because it's not kosher, or promote marriage within the religion. (I can't claim that there aren't Jews who feel they are better than others, but what society, race or religion doesn't have such people?)
It hurts us (moderate to liberal Jews in particular) deeply to hear that people think that we're exclusivists when one of our principal laws teach us to "love thy neighbor". Our patriarch Abraham is famous for inviting strangers into his tent - and they sure weren't Jews because there weren't any others! The Jewish trend to want to live together in tight-knit communities is primarily due to the desire for a more comfortable life such as being close to kosher food sources and within walking distance of synagogues since travel is prohibited on the Sabbath and other holidays - not because we think of others as inferiors who we don't want to mix with. In Israel in particular, there is the additive desire to live together as a defensive stance in front of the outside world which I have described in prior e-mails. It is indeed this misunderstanding of Jew's desire to "hang together" that many of us believe allow people to begin down the slippery slope of hate - "those Jew bastards don't think we're good enough for them...we don't need 'em here" - therefore the harsh, angry reaction to your words.
(As an aside, remember that just as radical Muslim militants distort the world's views of the Muslim community at large, so the ultra-Orthodox Jewish community presents a false impression of the mainstream Jewish community, 90% of which are not Orthodox, but are Conservative, Reform or otherwise affiliated.) I am Conservative (not too religious, not too secular) myself although I did choose to live in an area that is more Jewish than most based on the general reasons cited above.
As to some of the reader's other comments, he seems to want you to apologize for everything that people claim is wrong in Palestinian society. I don't think you should have to do that every time you write a column criticizing a particular policy or action. I don't remember where I read it, but I did see an interesting comment somewhere that an Arab that condemns Arab actions must also include a condemnation of Israel somewhere in the article lest they be perceived of as an "Uncle Tom" of sorts. Similarly, any Jew who criticizes Israeli policy has to include a comment about those policies not justifying Palestinian militancy.
I'm sure you won't mind if I comment that it seems that even you succumbed somewhat to this standard by stating that the government of Israel has murderous ways. Assuming that's a correct and fair statement, what does that have to do with the suicide bombings, unless you're saying that one leads to the other and is therefore understandable? If it's understandable, it's a natural reaction - and how can we possibly condemn Hamas' natural reaction to Israeli murders? Suicide bombing is either a good tactic or a bad one, a moral use of force or an immoral use of force, wholly independent of what caused that person to want to engage in that activity in the first place.
Here's what may be a bad analogy (which my friends know I have a tendency to dream up). If a vigilante kills someone to exact his revenge outside the court of law, it doesn't matter whether that revenge was for stealing a bottle of milk or for having had his wife raped and murdered. It's just wrong. What led the vigilante to murder another human being has no justification. End of story. I believe that's what you wanted to say about suicide bombings, but the criticism of Israel lessened the argument you were making, just as calling the robber or rapist a criminal above would have weakened the argument that what the vigilante did was 100% wrong.
Now it's time for me to go to bed! Forgive me if the late hour has made me slacken my attempts at impartiality.
Respectfully,
Howard
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here are my thoughts as you have requested:
First of all, even if this person had a good point, there is no room in civilized discourse to say things like, "As any educated person would know..." and claiming that your words incited anti-semitic acts. That's just not right. Now, I'll try and get into the mind of this person and explain what made him so irate.
When I read your article and saw that you said "Zionism...declares that Israel must be exclusively Jewish" that got my dander up too. In fact, I would say it was that one line that sparked this whole conversation we're having. Let's say that I and the other writer disagree with your statement...why does it upset us so, instead of just making us shake our heads? Your statement brings to mind, unintentionally I'm sure, the litany of prejudices about Jews setting themselves apart from everyone else because they feel they're better than non-Jews. This is often a false impression that is given by religious Jews who refuse to eat other's food because it's not kosher, or promote marriage within the religion. (I can't claim that there aren't Jews who feel they are better than others, but what society, race or religion doesn't have such people?)
It hurts us (moderate to liberal Jews in particular) deeply to hear that people think that we're exclusivists when one of our principal laws teach us to "love thy neighbor". Our patriarch Abraham is famous for inviting strangers into his tent - and they sure weren't Jews because there weren't any others! The Jewish trend to want to live together in tight-knit communities is primarily due to the desire for a more comfortable life such as being close to kosher food sources and within walking distance of synagogues since travel is prohibited on the Sabbath and other holidays - not because we think of others as inferiors who we don't want to mix with. In Israel in particular, there is the additive desire to live together as a defensive stance in front of the outside world which I have described in prior e-mails. It is indeed this misunderstanding of Jew's desire to "hang together" that many of us believe allow people to begin down the slippery slope of hate - "those Jew bastards don't think we're good enough for them...we don't need 'em here" - therefore the harsh, angry reaction to your words.
(As an aside, remember that just as radical Muslim militants distort the world's views of the Muslim community at large, so the ultra-Orthodox Jewish community presents a false impression of the mainstream Jewish community, 90% of which are not Orthodox, but are Conservative, Reform or otherwise affiliated.) I am Conservative (not too religious, not too secular) myself although I did choose to live in an area that is more Jewish than most based on the general reasons cited above.
As to some of the reader's other comments, he seems to want you to apologize for everything that people claim is wrong in Palestinian society. I don't think you should have to do that every time you write a column criticizing a particular policy or action. I don't remember where I read it, but I did see an interesting comment somewhere that an Arab that condemns Arab actions must also include a condemnation of Israel somewhere in the article lest they be perceived of as an "Uncle Tom" of sorts. Similarly, any Jew who criticizes Israeli policy has to include a comment about those policies not justifying Palestinian militancy.
I'm sure you won't mind if I comment that it seems that even you succumbed somewhat to this standard by stating that the government of Israel has murderous ways. Assuming that's a correct and fair statement, what does that have to do with the suicide bombings, unless you're saying that one leads to the other and is therefore understandable? If it's understandable, it's a natural reaction - and how can we possibly condemn Hamas' natural reaction to Israeli murders? Suicide bombing is either a good tactic or a bad one, a moral use of force or an immoral use of force, wholly independent of what caused that person to want to engage in that activity in the first place.
Here's what may be a bad analogy (which my friends know I have a tendency to dream up). If a vigilante kills someone to exact his revenge outside the court of law, it doesn't matter whether that revenge was for stealing a bottle of milk or for having had his wife raped and murdered. It's just wrong. What led the vigilante to murder another human being has no justification. End of story. I believe that's what you wanted to say about suicide bombings, but the criticism of Israel lessened the argument you were making, just as calling the robber or rapist a criminal above would have weakened the argument that what the vigilante did was 100% wrong.
Now it's time for me to go to bed! Forgive me if the late hour has made me slacken my attempts at impartiality.
Respectfully,
Howard
Friday, October 10, 2003
Ray Hanania and I have had a very heartfelt e-mail exchange on the plights of our two peoples. See below for the latest. Maybe we can figure this thing out eventually amongst ourselves.....
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks Howard for your comments.
I appreciate them and recognize your sincerity to be fair, which is probably the only thing we can ask of each other. Rather than say you are right or wrong, or vice versus, Palestinians and Israelis need to engage in a constructive dialogue of understanding.
As a palestinian, here is how I view things (very summarized, of course).
I don't agree that they should have divided Palestine into two states that crisscrossed illogically. The Partition was flawed and made to fail. But, since Israel was established and because events have changed so much over the past 50 years, I don't believe that Palestinians should continue to argue about whether or not the creation of Israel was right or wrong. It's there. Deal with it. Most Palestinians agree with me.
Most Palestinians do accept the ability to create a state in the West Bank and gaza Strip with East Jerusalem as its capitol. If that were ever really offered, we would take it.
The problem, as I see it, is that while some Israeli officials say theys upport the concept of a Palestinian state, they don't offer a vision of what that state will be like. It's almost like they have a precondition: Palestinians accept Israel and its security, then we negotiate about the borders. Palestinians fear that Israel will whittle the "state" down to small strips of land, divided by Israeli roads and settlements. And, while they negotiate, they continue to build and expand new settlements.
It's makes it hard for even the most supportive of the State of Israel to feel comfortable that Israel willdeliver what it implies but does not really say.
I'm not saying that Israel is right or wrong. Just trying to help you understand what themajor problem is on our side.
Add to all this on both our sides, extremism. Settler extremism which results in violence and death. Hamas/Islamic Jihad extremism which results in violence and death. Israeli military excesses that result in the killing of innocent civilians. Palestinian police excesses that encourage Hamas and Islamic Jihad rather than undermining them.
You need to recognize that the real fight is between extremists and moderates. The moderates on both sides don't have to agree on every detail, just the hard core principles. And they need to work together, even when we find ourselves angry and emotional over events. There isn't one Palestinian or Israeli, Arab or Jew who hasn't said something they should regret. On both sides.
I'm not Muslim but I am discriminated against as if I were a Muslim. Arab buildings are vandalized. We had seven Arab newspapers in Chicago and six have been forced to close because of bigotry and no one is doing anything about it, except saying it's part of the Arab community "extremism" against Israel.
I fear for both of us, but again, I recognize your feelings, hear what you are saying and genuinely wish we could all arrive at a settlement that is fair to both sides. I think it is possible. I'm just not sure we have a situation where both sides are fairly positioned to achieve it or are being treated in a fair and balanced manner.
best regards
Ray Hanania
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks Howard for your comments.
I appreciate them and recognize your sincerity to be fair, which is probably the only thing we can ask of each other. Rather than say you are right or wrong, or vice versus, Palestinians and Israelis need to engage in a constructive dialogue of understanding.
As a palestinian, here is how I view things (very summarized, of course).
I don't agree that they should have divided Palestine into two states that crisscrossed illogically. The Partition was flawed and made to fail. But, since Israel was established and because events have changed so much over the past 50 years, I don't believe that Palestinians should continue to argue about whether or not the creation of Israel was right or wrong. It's there. Deal with it. Most Palestinians agree with me.
Most Palestinians do accept the ability to create a state in the West Bank and gaza Strip with East Jerusalem as its capitol. If that were ever really offered, we would take it.
The problem, as I see it, is that while some Israeli officials say theys upport the concept of a Palestinian state, they don't offer a vision of what that state will be like. It's almost like they have a precondition: Palestinians accept Israel and its security, then we negotiate about the borders. Palestinians fear that Israel will whittle the "state" down to small strips of land, divided by Israeli roads and settlements. And, while they negotiate, they continue to build and expand new settlements.
It's makes it hard for even the most supportive of the State of Israel to feel comfortable that Israel willdeliver what it implies but does not really say.
I'm not saying that Israel is right or wrong. Just trying to help you understand what themajor problem is on our side.
Add to all this on both our sides, extremism. Settler extremism which results in violence and death. Hamas/Islamic Jihad extremism which results in violence and death. Israeli military excesses that result in the killing of innocent civilians. Palestinian police excesses that encourage Hamas and Islamic Jihad rather than undermining them.
You need to recognize that the real fight is between extremists and moderates. The moderates on both sides don't have to agree on every detail, just the hard core principles. And they need to work together, even when we find ourselves angry and emotional over events. There isn't one Palestinian or Israeli, Arab or Jew who hasn't said something they should regret. On both sides.
I'm not Muslim but I am discriminated against as if I were a Muslim. Arab buildings are vandalized. We had seven Arab newspapers in Chicago and six have been forced to close because of bigotry and no one is doing anything about it, except saying it's part of the Arab community "extremism" against Israel.
I fear for both of us, but again, I recognize your feelings, hear what you are saying and genuinely wish we could all arrive at a settlement that is fair to both sides. I think it is possible. I'm just not sure we have a situation where both sides are fairly positioned to achieve it or are being treated in a fair and balanced manner.
best regards
Ray Hanania
Thursday, October 09, 2003
On October 8, I posted regarding a column written by Ray Hanania. I told him that although I disagreed with some of his positions, I felt he was unfairly treated when the Dallas News edited his column, taking out entire paragraphs that I thought changed the tone of his column somewhat. I also sent him an e-mail to that effect and he very kindly wrote me back immediately. Here is his response:
Thanks Howard for your comments.
Newspapers have the right to edit for a lot of reasons. I am sure you know that most people who read my columns find something they don't like and focus on that, rather than looking at the bigger picture. Or, they ignore the positives and always focus on the negatives.
I think that I have an obligation to speak fairly and try to define a moderate middle voice which means that I can criticize both sides with equal enthusiasm and passion, don't you think. When the otherside recognizes that this is good -- not bad -- to have someone criticize in a genuinely middle of the road way that is balanced and fair and recognizes many of their issues, then maybe we might be all able to better understand each other.
One reader attacked me saying that this was the "first time" or that I "finally" condemned suicide bombers, instead of standing with me and saying I am glad there is a voice of reason in the Palestinian community even though I don't agree with all of his points. The fact is, the criticism was even worse because it wasn't the first time and, as you may know, I posted the articles I have copies of dating back to 1994 where I have publicly denounced suicide bombings in strong terms and without qualifications. I have tried to be consistent.
Sure, I make a few mistakes or have let my emotions get the best of me,m like in April 2002 the time of the worst fighting between Palestinians and Israelis and many people died (on both sides) including friends and relatives of my friends and relatives in Bethlehem. Comparing Sharon as "Nazi-like" was out of bounds and the result of my failure to reason at that difficult time. My wife explained that it's not whether or not Sharon is a Nazi, but thatusing the term offends all Jews who see the Nazi crimes and the Holocaust in a special light and using it outside of that context is wrong. Okay, Sharon's politics are terrible and offensive and encourage more conflict and death. Am I not allowed to criticize his politics?
best regards
PS ... please reprint the entire email. A guy named Al Barger at another blog engaged in an email discussion with me and then edited the emails and posted them and by the time I realized he had distorted things I said, it was too late. I thinkw e can have a fair debate without exaggerating that which we disagree with in each other, don't you think?
Ray Hanania
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Since I don't get many chances to correspond with members of the Palestinian Arab community, I decided to send back to him a reply from the heart about what I feel about "the situation":
Thanks for your response - I promise to post the whole thing and I look forward to reading your future columns.
Since you were kind enough to respond so quickly, I would like to tell you what I think is the basis of all Israeli policy and of Zionism in general. I believe this because it is something I feel deep in my soul and I don't have the chance to share it with too many people of Arab descent. Many Jews, and not just Israelis, fear that if Israel is ever lost, they will not be safe anywhere in the world. Sure the U.S and Europe are pretty comfortable places to live now, but that's what Jews have thought throughout history in every country they lived comfortably in, until of course, it wasn't.
In recent generations we have seen one third of our population wiped out by one of the most "enlightened" societies of Europe. Before that it was pogroms in Russia and Poland, expulsions from this or that country, etc. For two thousand years, if we were kicked out of one place we moved to another and so on, and so on, for centuries. There were always open, tolerant countries for us to migrate too. It may not have been the best of situations, but we always made do.
At the end of World War II, things changed - there was literally nowhere to go for hundreds of thousands, if not millions of Jews. Palestine was the only option for them (and even that was technically illegal). Boatloads of refugees were literally turned back to sea everywhere in the world, even from the United States.
It was not, and is not, the Palestinian Arabs' responsibility to feel sorry for, or provide refuge for, the Jews of that era and their descendants. One could say though, that there are really only three options that the Palestinians had/have given that Jews had no other choice but to force themselves onto Palestinian society. One would be to welcome the Jews, accept the influx of new people (is it too flippant to compare them to the Mexicans moving to California and Texas?) and integrate them into the local landscape. The second would be to declare all out war and accept the results of that war. The third is to have constant conflict hoping that the someone will eventually be sick of it and leave. Without placing blame on either party to the conflict, numbers one and two were tried for awhile and didn't work out. It also appears that neither side's leaders want to try those options again - not the first for lack of trust and not the second for fear of losing everything.
So here we are stuck with option number three, at least until there is a major change in "the situation", as the Israelis like to call it. Whatever that change will be, I believe it will come from the Palestinian side, whether it's a mega-terror attack or the development of a true democracy in Palestine. Something that will tip the balance to all-out war (G-d forbid) or all-out peace. I believe this because the only real significant action that Israel can take, unilateral withdrawal, has not led to peace on the Lebanese border due to the same groups that operate freely within the West Bank and Gaza, therefore Israel will never take that step.
As I finish writing this to you, a story just appeared on my local TV about swastikas being marked on someone's car here in the Dallas area. In the year since I've lived here, swastikas were painted on my synagogue's doors. That's why the Jews need Israel. That's why I need Israel - just in case. Somewhere where Jews can dream of being left alone to have control over their own lives and live in peace for a long a time as we can imagine. No matter what the cost.
Respectfully,
Howard
I imagine he is a very busy man who will not be able to keep up a daily conversation with one of his readers, but I promise to post his reply should he choose to provide one.
Thanks Howard for your comments.
Newspapers have the right to edit for a lot of reasons. I am sure you know that most people who read my columns find something they don't like and focus on that, rather than looking at the bigger picture. Or, they ignore the positives and always focus on the negatives.
I think that I have an obligation to speak fairly and try to define a moderate middle voice which means that I can criticize both sides with equal enthusiasm and passion, don't you think. When the otherside recognizes that this is good -- not bad -- to have someone criticize in a genuinely middle of the road way that is balanced and fair and recognizes many of their issues, then maybe we might be all able to better understand each other.
One reader attacked me saying that this was the "first time" or that I "finally" condemned suicide bombers, instead of standing with me and saying I am glad there is a voice of reason in the Palestinian community even though I don't agree with all of his points. The fact is, the criticism was even worse because it wasn't the first time and, as you may know, I posted the articles I have copies of dating back to 1994 where I have publicly denounced suicide bombings in strong terms and without qualifications. I have tried to be consistent.
Sure, I make a few mistakes or have let my emotions get the best of me,m like in April 2002 the time of the worst fighting between Palestinians and Israelis and many people died (on both sides) including friends and relatives of my friends and relatives in Bethlehem. Comparing Sharon as "Nazi-like" was out of bounds and the result of my failure to reason at that difficult time. My wife explained that it's not whether or not Sharon is a Nazi, but thatusing the term offends all Jews who see the Nazi crimes and the Holocaust in a special light and using it outside of that context is wrong. Okay, Sharon's politics are terrible and offensive and encourage more conflict and death. Am I not allowed to criticize his politics?
best regards
PS ... please reprint the entire email. A guy named Al Barger at another blog engaged in an email discussion with me and then edited the emails and posted them and by the time I realized he had distorted things I said, it was too late. I thinkw e can have a fair debate without exaggerating that which we disagree with in each other, don't you think?
Ray Hanania
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Since I don't get many chances to correspond with members of the Palestinian Arab community, I decided to send back to him a reply from the heart about what I feel about "the situation":
Thanks for your response - I promise to post the whole thing and I look forward to reading your future columns.
Since you were kind enough to respond so quickly, I would like to tell you what I think is the basis of all Israeli policy and of Zionism in general. I believe this because it is something I feel deep in my soul and I don't have the chance to share it with too many people of Arab descent. Many Jews, and not just Israelis, fear that if Israel is ever lost, they will not be safe anywhere in the world. Sure the U.S and Europe are pretty comfortable places to live now, but that's what Jews have thought throughout history in every country they lived comfortably in, until of course, it wasn't.
In recent generations we have seen one third of our population wiped out by one of the most "enlightened" societies of Europe. Before that it was pogroms in Russia and Poland, expulsions from this or that country, etc. For two thousand years, if we were kicked out of one place we moved to another and so on, and so on, for centuries. There were always open, tolerant countries for us to migrate too. It may not have been the best of situations, but we always made do.
At the end of World War II, things changed - there was literally nowhere to go for hundreds of thousands, if not millions of Jews. Palestine was the only option for them (and even that was technically illegal). Boatloads of refugees were literally turned back to sea everywhere in the world, even from the United States.
It was not, and is not, the Palestinian Arabs' responsibility to feel sorry for, or provide refuge for, the Jews of that era and their descendants. One could say though, that there are really only three options that the Palestinians had/have given that Jews had no other choice but to force themselves onto Palestinian society. One would be to welcome the Jews, accept the influx of new people (is it too flippant to compare them to the Mexicans moving to California and Texas?) and integrate them into the local landscape. The second would be to declare all out war and accept the results of that war. The third is to have constant conflict hoping that the someone will eventually be sick of it and leave. Without placing blame on either party to the conflict, numbers one and two were tried for awhile and didn't work out. It also appears that neither side's leaders want to try those options again - not the first for lack of trust and not the second for fear of losing everything.
So here we are stuck with option number three, at least until there is a major change in "the situation", as the Israelis like to call it. Whatever that change will be, I believe it will come from the Palestinian side, whether it's a mega-terror attack or the development of a true democracy in Palestine. Something that will tip the balance to all-out war (G-d forbid) or all-out peace. I believe this because the only real significant action that Israel can take, unilateral withdrawal, has not led to peace on the Lebanese border due to the same groups that operate freely within the West Bank and Gaza, therefore Israel will never take that step.
As I finish writing this to you, a story just appeared on my local TV about swastikas being marked on someone's car here in the Dallas area. In the year since I've lived here, swastikas were painted on my synagogue's doors. That's why the Jews need Israel. That's why I need Israel - just in case. Somewhere where Jews can dream of being left alone to have control over their own lives and live in peace for a long a time as we can imagine. No matter what the cost.
Respectfully,
Howard
I imagine he is a very busy man who will not be able to keep up a daily conversation with one of his readers, but I promise to post his reply should he choose to provide one.
Here's another of the many articles out there written by our brave men and women who have seen action in Iraq. The Dallas Observer is produced by New Times, which is about as liberal as news organizations get in this country. (Not that there's anything wrong with that - my best friend actually works for them.) Couldn't they find a soldier or reservist to talk about how they were forced to rape and kill innocent women and children? Hmmm, maybe we ARE the good guys after all.
As an aside, I haven't read it yet, but I unsderstand that Front Line Voices is supposed to be an excellent collection of work by those who were "Over There".
As an aside, I haven't read it yet, but I unsderstand that Front Line Voices is supposed to be an excellent collection of work by those who were "Over There".
If I knew how, I'd put up a poll. Do you think Yasser Arafat is suffering from cancer, the flu, a heart attack, or nothing at all?
Wednesday, October 08, 2003
Please check out my brother-in-law's site listed under my new Interesting Stuff section (it's the one called Weird is Relative). If you like cool science stuff and a good sense of humor sprinkled in, this is a link for you. I do think he posts Ted Rall cartoons just to aggravate me, but I can't be sure.
Here is a very detailed article about the only boy on an otherwise all-girl's drill team here in the Dallas area. You do have to see the related pictures to believe them. The only question the reporter failed to ask was "why"? Don't they teach that any more in journalism school? I'm neither for, nor against what Geroge is doing, but I'm dying to know.....why? Was this his dream growing up? Did he want an easy way to meet girls? Or guys? In a way it's not fair to George that he's not asked, becuase although he comes across as an amazing person, joining the drill team still seems like a totally irrational thing to do.
By the way, Cedar Hill's own website still refers to the Highsteppers as "lovely, talented...."
By the way, Cedar Hill's own website still refers to the Highsteppers as "lovely, talented...."
Come on, admit it - you want one just for fun even though it's a little late...Arnold Schwarzenegger for Governor bumper stickers.
Someone should call Webster's and just have them add this article under their definition of ironic: Bear Mauling Kills Grizzly Advocate, Friend
In today's Dallas Morning News, a column attributed to Ray Hanania, a Palestinian Arab-American, has these wonderful insights into the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
"Zionism...declares that Israel must be exclusively Jewish." There is nothing in Zionism that declares that Israel must be exclusively Jewish - just that it has a majority of Jews and that it remains place of refuge for Jews all over the world. There's no way to guarantee that unless there actually is a majority of Jews in the country. From the Encyclopedia Britannica entry for Zionism - "Jewish nationalist movement that has had as its goal the creation and support of a Jewish national state in Palestine , the ancient homeland of the Jews." It is hard to define whether Jewish here refers to the people or the religion, but there is nothing mentioned about exclusivity. Plenty of Muslims and Christians live in Israel proper - about 20% of the population.
"Israelis won't condemn their government's murderous ways until Palestinians condemn their own". - I was about to argue that there are plenty of Israeli peace activists and organizations that condemn the Sharon government - everything from Peace Now which gathers tens of thousands for it's demonstrations, to those helping the International Solidarity Movement, to the two dozen or so air force pilots who recently vowed not to fly missions in the territories as it was against their conscience. The problem is that THIS IS NOT WHAT RAY HANANIA WROTE!
The Dallas Morning News edited Mr. Hanania's column which I didn't think newspapers could do. I can't even link to what was printed in the newspaper because there is no link for some reason to this column on their website.
What he actually wrote was the following:
"Israel's fanatic government continues to exploit this void in leadership by conducting its own acts of outrage and horror. But until Palestinians can dim the glow of the suicide bomber, they will never be able to stir the fundamental sense of fairness and desire for compromise that I believe is in the hearts of the majority of Israelis.
They won't condemn their government's murderous ways until Palestinians condemn their own."
The whole first paragraph was not published in the newspaper! While I still don't agree with certain things in the column, here he seems to be addressing the fact that the MAJORITY OF ISRAELIS back Sharon with which I would agree. Without this paragraph, he appears to claim that no Israelis speak out against Sharon which is untrue. Also, how the Dallas Morning news can remove the line about the hearts of the majority of Israelis is beyond me. It changes the whole tone of the article from moderate to hard-line.
Honestly, I'm going to write an e-mail to Mr. Hanania to tell him how he has been misrepresented to the Dallas community.
"Zionism...declares that Israel must be exclusively Jewish." There is nothing in Zionism that declares that Israel must be exclusively Jewish - just that it has a majority of Jews and that it remains place of refuge for Jews all over the world. There's no way to guarantee that unless there actually is a majority of Jews in the country. From the Encyclopedia Britannica entry for Zionism - "Jewish nationalist movement that has had as its goal the creation and support of a Jewish national state in Palestine , the ancient homeland of the Jews." It is hard to define whether Jewish here refers to the people or the religion, but there is nothing mentioned about exclusivity. Plenty of Muslims and Christians live in Israel proper - about 20% of the population.
"Israelis won't condemn their government's murderous ways until Palestinians condemn their own". - I was about to argue that there are plenty of Israeli peace activists and organizations that condemn the Sharon government - everything from Peace Now which gathers tens of thousands for it's demonstrations, to those helping the International Solidarity Movement, to the two dozen or so air force pilots who recently vowed not to fly missions in the territories as it was against their conscience. The problem is that THIS IS NOT WHAT RAY HANANIA WROTE!
The Dallas Morning News edited Mr. Hanania's column which I didn't think newspapers could do. I can't even link to what was printed in the newspaper because there is no link for some reason to this column on their website.
What he actually wrote was the following:
"Israel's fanatic government continues to exploit this void in leadership by conducting its own acts of outrage and horror. But until Palestinians can dim the glow of the suicide bomber, they will never be able to stir the fundamental sense of fairness and desire for compromise that I believe is in the hearts of the majority of Israelis.
They won't condemn their government's murderous ways until Palestinians condemn their own."
The whole first paragraph was not published in the newspaper! While I still don't agree with certain things in the column, here he seems to be addressing the fact that the MAJORITY OF ISRAELIS back Sharon with which I would agree. Without this paragraph, he appears to claim that no Israelis speak out against Sharon which is untrue. Also, how the Dallas Morning news can remove the line about the hearts of the majority of Israelis is beyond me. It changes the whole tone of the article from moderate to hard-line.
Honestly, I'm going to write an e-mail to Mr. Hanania to tell him how he has been misrepresented to the Dallas community.
Tuesday, October 07, 2003
I haven't seen this reported anywhere except NY1 - 35 cars owned by Jews had their tires slashed in Crown Heights on Yom Kippur.
It makes me incredibly angry that this kind of thing still goes on in the 21st century. No, it's not a suicide bomb or the firebombing of a synagogue, but can someone please tell me why can't Jews live in peace anywhere? I mean, if we all went to live in Antarctica, would people leave us alone, or would they blame us for the Ozone hole and chase us down even there (and slash the reins on our dogsleds on Passover)?
It makes me incredibly angry that this kind of thing still goes on in the 21st century. No, it's not a suicide bomb or the firebombing of a synagogue, but can someone please tell me why can't Jews live in peace anywhere? I mean, if we all went to live in Antarctica, would people leave us alone, or would they blame us for the Ozone hole and chase us down even there (and slash the reins on our dogsleds on Passover)?
Perhaps Yasser Arafat was not inscribed this year in the Book of Life?
One other thing - I wonder if all the Israeli peace activists protecting him held Yom Kippur services in the Muqata? Click on the link that says "Human Shields at the Mukat'a 07/10/03" for an update.
One other thing - I wonder if all the Israeli peace activists protecting him held Yom Kippur services in the Muqata? Click on the link that says "Human Shields at the Mukat'a 07/10/03" for an update.
My rabbi mentioned in tonight's Yom Kippur service that he heard of sign in a pizza shop in Florida that says the following:
"Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people."
(Further surfing credits this saying to either Unknown, Eleanor Roosevelt or Admiral Rickover).
I think I know where the staff of the E! channel fits in. That's not to say that I don't enjoy Howard Stern. I just have to learn not to. Actually, Howard does discuss events on his show, so I guess that makes him a small-to-average mind.
Here's a talmudic style follow-up....Does talking about any upcoming Jen-Ben wedding plans count as talking about events or people?
It's definitely getting late..I better get to sleep.
"Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people."
(Further surfing credits this saying to either Unknown, Eleanor Roosevelt or Admiral Rickover).
I think I know where the staff of the E! channel fits in. That's not to say that I don't enjoy Howard Stern. I just have to learn not to. Actually, Howard does discuss events on his show, so I guess that makes him a small-to-average mind.
Here's a talmudic style follow-up....Does talking about any upcoming Jen-Ben wedding plans count as talking about events or people?
It's definitely getting late..I better get to sleep.
Monday, October 06, 2003
I know that there isn't now, nor has there ever been, any logic to the world's treatment of Israel, but could there be a clearer case of double standards than what happened in the Middle East this weekend?
Palestinian kills 19 innocent people in Israel (Jews and Arabs). Israel retaliates by killing no one while striking a base inside Syria of those who openly claim responsibility for the suicide bombing. World reaction - outrage and special UN sessions.
Israeli soldier patrolling inside Israel killed by fire directed from Lebanese territory. Innocent child also killed in attempt to strike into Israel. World reaction - I don't know, did you hear anything?
Palestinian kills 19 innocent people in Israel (Jews and Arabs). Israel retaliates by killing no one while striking a base inside Syria of those who openly claim responsibility for the suicide bombing. World reaction - outrage and special UN sessions.
Israeli soldier patrolling inside Israel killed by fire directed from Lebanese territory. Innocent child also killed in attempt to strike into Israel. World reaction - I don't know, did you hear anything?
Saturday, October 04, 2003
I could write about the horrors of the most recent suicide bombing, but what remains left to be said? Instead I will direct you to a disturbing sight closer to home. I have to say that in general I do agree with the backers of the First Amendment who say the only way to fight "bad" speech is with "good" speech - not to eliminate the right to bad speech. And I guess you can't really have laws against purely hateful speech or acts when no person or property is physically harmed. If that's so, why does it bother me so much that this type of activity is not punishable?
OK, OK, I just have to print this lovely quote from a brother of today's suicide bomber...
"They were shocked to hear she was responsible for the bombing, "but we are receiving congratulations from people," Thaher Jaradat, her younger brother said. "Why should we cry? It is like her wedding today, the happiest day for her," he said."
And I'm supposed to get upset if an Israeli soldier wants to give this man and his friends a cavity search every time they want to pass near a Jewish town? Pardon me, but I'm about to donate a gross of the longest surgical gloves I can find to the Israeli Army and see if they can't put them to good use.
I also just bought a book called "Right to Exist: A Moral Defense of Israel's Wars" by Yaacov Lozowick. I assume that it's similar in content to Alan Dershowitz' "The Case for Israel". In any case, I feel much better about myself after reading these types of books and actually become hopeful that the world would be on our side if they only knew the truth.
I now take back my comment about the surgical gloves. Can't we all just get along?
OK, OK, I just have to print this lovely quote from a brother of today's suicide bomber...
"They were shocked to hear she was responsible for the bombing, "but we are receiving congratulations from people," Thaher Jaradat, her younger brother said. "Why should we cry? It is like her wedding today, the happiest day for her," he said."
And I'm supposed to get upset if an Israeli soldier wants to give this man and his friends a cavity search every time they want to pass near a Jewish town? Pardon me, but I'm about to donate a gross of the longest surgical gloves I can find to the Israeli Army and see if they can't put them to good use.
I also just bought a book called "Right to Exist: A Moral Defense of Israel's Wars" by Yaacov Lozowick. I assume that it's similar in content to Alan Dershowitz' "The Case for Israel". In any case, I feel much better about myself after reading these types of books and actually become hopeful that the world would be on our side if they only knew the truth.
I now take back my comment about the surgical gloves. Can't we all just get along?
Friday, October 03, 2003
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force if necessary to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
Disgusting how those Republicans followed that idiot Bush so blindly - we should be ashamed of ourselves as a nation. Oh, but wait a minute - did I mention that these quotes are from Bill Clinton, Nancy Pelosi and John Kerry. And yet, there's much, much, more.
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force if necessary to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
Disgusting how those Republicans followed that idiot Bush so blindly - we should be ashamed of ourselves as a nation. Oh, but wait a minute - did I mention that these quotes are from Bill Clinton, Nancy Pelosi and John Kerry. And yet, there's much, much, more.
If I'm ever interested in finding out whether a movie I want to see is any good or not, I go right to Roger Ebert's site at the Chicago Sun-Times. I could probably count on one hand the number of times over the years that I may have disagreed strongly with his review of a film.
Another place that I tend to read for reviews is the New York Times. While I don't always agree and often don't understand what their critics are even talking about, there is no doubt that they treat film as an art and take the medium very seriously. So when you read a Times review with the following comment......
"Jimmy Markum is not only one of the best performances of the year, but also one of the definitive pieces of screen acting in the last half-century, the culmination of a realist tradition that began in the old Actor's Studio and begat Brando, Dean, Pacino and De Niro."
......you have to be interested. The movie is "Mystic River" starring Sean Penn, Kevin Bacon and Tim Robbins - directed by Clint Eastwood. Go here to read the entire review. Go here for the trailer.
Another place that I tend to read for reviews is the New York Times. While I don't always agree and often don't understand what their critics are even talking about, there is no doubt that they treat film as an art and take the medium very seriously. So when you read a Times review with the following comment......
"Jimmy Markum is not only one of the best performances of the year, but also one of the definitive pieces of screen acting in the last half-century, the culmination of a realist tradition that began in the old Actor's Studio and begat Brando, Dean, Pacino and De Niro."
......you have to be interested. The movie is "Mystic River" starring Sean Penn, Kevin Bacon and Tim Robbins - directed by Clint Eastwood. Go here to read the entire review. Go here for the trailer.
I just had to copy this part of Bill Whittle's essay on Power, mentioned in yesterday's bloggage for those who don't have the patience to read what they must:
"There is loose in the world a cancer, a cult of death and destruction, a force that loves nothing but destruction and pain and revenge for slights real and imagined. We face people whose hatred and rage sends them into fits of ecstasy at the thought of their own children being blown to bloody shreds so long as they can kill as many innocents as possible. And the higher we build the more fervent and hardened their desire to bring us down.
It is a sickness, it is a disease – it is, in fact, the last animal howling of rage and impotence at a new idea of humanity that is, at a long, bloody and terrible price, fighting and winning a war against racism, sexism, religious extremism, tribalism, conformity and slavery.
It is a war for and against the liberal freedoms of the West, for and against the idea of self-determination, personal liberty and responsibility, human creativity, diversity, and freedom of expression.
It is a fight to the death for and against a culture that can build marvels like skyscrapers and airliners, acts of technological and creative daring, and fill them with individuals of every nation and religion and color united by their desire to work hard and get along with one another, people who have traded in machetes and blood feuds for letter openers and water-cooler gossip. We are fighting a nihilistic force, a force that creates nothing and would destroy this entire world for their place in the next if given the means, a force that hijacks – both literally and figuratively -- these miracles of industry, creativity and compromise and brings them down in blood and fire and ruin.
It is a fight that we cannot avoid. Despite the bleats of terrified apologists and appeasers, this is not a fight against what we have done, but rather a war against who we are and what we believe and represent. That is why we must remind ourselves, daily remind ourselves, that all these miraculous things we take for granted are not the natural state of man, but new and terrifying ideas for millions of people shackled to the past, ideas that must be fought for and maintained by force if need be. Maintained by power, the vast power generated by freedom and creativity and cooperation.
And yet, we woke up on the first day after the world had changed, woke up to find the plainest evidence possible that we are at war with yet another enemy of civilization and progress, and what did we see?
We saw the rest of the Western world cowering in fear and self-hatred, awash in the disease of self-doubt and myopia that comes from decades of success and luxury – the same disease that brought Rome from the stability and growth of the Pax Romana to the decadent and self-loathing horrors of Caligula. We saw a few friends – pitifully few; painfully few -- ready to stand and fight this disease, this death cult of Terror. And of the rest?
They have traded in their power, their means of self-defense, for 35 hour work weeks and months of paid vacations and pre-paid health care and covered it with a patina of moral superiority that masks a rotten and tottering foundation. They have become cultures unwilling to pay the price to defend themselves, cultures so pessimistic and cynical that they have – literally and without rhetorical flourish – lost the will to live to the degree that parents outnumber their children and birthrates plummet through replacement levels and into the basement of collapse and ruin.
And so who is willing, who indeed is even able to fight back in the defense of skyscrapers and bridges, of jetliners and miracle drugs? Who will stand and fight the forces that wish to tear down our cities, shroud our women, burn our science, execute critics, torture the different and destroy our new and alien ideas of personal freedom and responsibility, ideas that have lifted billions from the perpetual fear and horror that have been the lot of the Damned Human Race since man walked upright?
Who will fight for that? Who?
We will fight for it. America. Fallible, human, flawed America will fight. Australia – another tough and proud nation of free men and women will fight. Great Britain, that ancient champion of decency and fair play. Poland, who knows more about war and horror than perhaps any place on earth – she has shown she will fight. Israel. Israel who has borne this burden alone for decades…"
"There is loose in the world a cancer, a cult of death and destruction, a force that loves nothing but destruction and pain and revenge for slights real and imagined. We face people whose hatred and rage sends them into fits of ecstasy at the thought of their own children being blown to bloody shreds so long as they can kill as many innocents as possible. And the higher we build the more fervent and hardened their desire to bring us down.
It is a sickness, it is a disease – it is, in fact, the last animal howling of rage and impotence at a new idea of humanity that is, at a long, bloody and terrible price, fighting and winning a war against racism, sexism, religious extremism, tribalism, conformity and slavery.
It is a war for and against the liberal freedoms of the West, for and against the idea of self-determination, personal liberty and responsibility, human creativity, diversity, and freedom of expression.
It is a fight to the death for and against a culture that can build marvels like skyscrapers and airliners, acts of technological and creative daring, and fill them with individuals of every nation and religion and color united by their desire to work hard and get along with one another, people who have traded in machetes and blood feuds for letter openers and water-cooler gossip. We are fighting a nihilistic force, a force that creates nothing and would destroy this entire world for their place in the next if given the means, a force that hijacks – both literally and figuratively -- these miracles of industry, creativity and compromise and brings them down in blood and fire and ruin.
It is a fight that we cannot avoid. Despite the bleats of terrified apologists and appeasers, this is not a fight against what we have done, but rather a war against who we are and what we believe and represent. That is why we must remind ourselves, daily remind ourselves, that all these miraculous things we take for granted are not the natural state of man, but new and terrifying ideas for millions of people shackled to the past, ideas that must be fought for and maintained by force if need be. Maintained by power, the vast power generated by freedom and creativity and cooperation.
And yet, we woke up on the first day after the world had changed, woke up to find the plainest evidence possible that we are at war with yet another enemy of civilization and progress, and what did we see?
We saw the rest of the Western world cowering in fear and self-hatred, awash in the disease of self-doubt and myopia that comes from decades of success and luxury – the same disease that brought Rome from the stability and growth of the Pax Romana to the decadent and self-loathing horrors of Caligula. We saw a few friends – pitifully few; painfully few -- ready to stand and fight this disease, this death cult of Terror. And of the rest?
They have traded in their power, their means of self-defense, for 35 hour work weeks and months of paid vacations and pre-paid health care and covered it with a patina of moral superiority that masks a rotten and tottering foundation. They have become cultures unwilling to pay the price to defend themselves, cultures so pessimistic and cynical that they have – literally and without rhetorical flourish – lost the will to live to the degree that parents outnumber their children and birthrates plummet through replacement levels and into the basement of collapse and ruin.
And so who is willing, who indeed is even able to fight back in the defense of skyscrapers and bridges, of jetliners and miracle drugs? Who will stand and fight the forces that wish to tear down our cities, shroud our women, burn our science, execute critics, torture the different and destroy our new and alien ideas of personal freedom and responsibility, ideas that have lifted billions from the perpetual fear and horror that have been the lot of the Damned Human Race since man walked upright?
Who will fight for that? Who?
We will fight for it. America. Fallible, human, flawed America will fight. Australia – another tough and proud nation of free men and women will fight. Great Britain, that ancient champion of decency and fair play. Poland, who knows more about war and horror than perhaps any place on earth – she has shown she will fight. Israel. Israel who has borne this burden alone for decades…"
Thursday, October 02, 2003
If you have the time, you must read Bill Whittle's essay on POWER. This is the 13th and possibly last of his essays on such things as LIBERTY, COURAGE, FREEDOM, ETC. These are must reads for anyone who thinks that we should be proud of our country, warts and all, and believe that we're the luckiest people on the face of the Earth.
Which we are.
A new link to all of Bill's essays at ejectejecteject.com can be found at the right.
Which we are.
A new link to all of Bill's essays at ejectejecteject.com can be found at the right.
I guess since this is local news for me, I have to comment on the use of the Nazi flag and playing of "Deutschland Uber Alles" at a high school football game. OK, it's not quite as sinister as it sounds, but it did kick up a minor fuss in the local press.
Honestly, I would have surely gotten a sick feeling in my stomach had I been in attendance. Of course, I never would have attended since they did this on Rosh Hashana! Ok, back to the point - I really don't think what the band director did was all that bad. I would question the use of a World War II celebration for a halftime show, but as long as the Nazi flag was shown with the other Axis Powers and winds up defeated in the end, isn't that the lesson we want to teach?
Also, I imagine that one can expect that a band director in New York City (if such a thing does actually exist) would know when Rosh Hashana comes out each year - if only because it's on the "Alternate Side of the Street" parking calendar. However, I don't expect that everyone in every town across America would have it marked on their calendars. I mean, seriously, how many of us know when Ramadan is, even with the greater publicity it's been getting in the last few years. The US even issues a stamp now for the Eid - their break-the-fast. Well there's as many Muslims as Jews in the U.S., so maybe we should know.
Between this band director, Rush Limbaugh and Arnold Schwarzenegger we could fill our newspapers with dumb, offensive thing that people do or say. Aren't there more important things going on in the world? Maybe I should think about the fact that all this is news because such great offenses are so rare - and that indeed is a good thing.
Honestly, I would have surely gotten a sick feeling in my stomach had I been in attendance. Of course, I never would have attended since they did this on Rosh Hashana! Ok, back to the point - I really don't think what the band director did was all that bad. I would question the use of a World War II celebration for a halftime show, but as long as the Nazi flag was shown with the other Axis Powers and winds up defeated in the end, isn't that the lesson we want to teach?
Also, I imagine that one can expect that a band director in New York City (if such a thing does actually exist) would know when Rosh Hashana comes out each year - if only because it's on the "Alternate Side of the Street" parking calendar. However, I don't expect that everyone in every town across America would have it marked on their calendars. I mean, seriously, how many of us know when Ramadan is, even with the greater publicity it's been getting in the last few years. The US even issues a stamp now for the Eid - their break-the-fast. Well there's as many Muslims as Jews in the U.S., so maybe we should know.
Between this band director, Rush Limbaugh and Arnold Schwarzenegger we could fill our newspapers with dumb, offensive thing that people do or say. Aren't there more important things going on in the world? Maybe I should think about the fact that all this is news because such great offenses are so rare - and that indeed is a good thing.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)